Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 24;11(5):1315–1324. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmaa038

TABLE 4.

Relative difference in Hb, SF, sTFR, and BI status from 4 legume food–based iron intervention studies conducted in low- and middle-income countries1

Improved bean Nonimproved bean
Study No. of intervention days Intake, mg Fe/d from bean meal Diff. Hb, g/L Diff. SF, mg/L Diff. sTFR, μg/L Diff. BI, mg/kg Intake, mg Fe/d from bean meal Diff. Hb, g/L Diff. SF, mg/L Diff. sTFR, μg/L Diff. BI, mg/kg
Haas et al., 2016 (27) 128 14.5 2.5*** 54+ −2.5 −214.3* 8.6 −0.8 36 0 −142.9
Abizari et al., 2012 (23) 210 17.25 10.1** −32.6*** −31.5*** −4.7*** 10.35 7.3 −46.0 −20.0 −36.8
Finkelstein et al., 2019 (30) 180 19 0 9.1 −1.2+ 7.0+ 11 2.0 21.7 2.6 8.3
Schümann et al., 2005 (24) 70 35 7.3 −15.8 n/a n/a 3.7 6.4 −30.6 n/a n/a
1

Difference (Diff.) in iron biomarker status is obtained by (endline reading minus baseline reading/baseline reading) × 100. n/a indicates that a particular biomarker was not assessed. Effect of legume food–based interventions on iron biomarker status (Hb, SF, sTFR, and BI): +P < 0.1; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001 shows significance of differences in baseline and endline measurements between the improved and nonimproved legume groups. BI, body iron; Hb, hemoglobin; SF, serum ferritin; sTFR, soluble transferrin receptor.