TABLE 2.
Summary of the RRs with 95% CIs and quality of the evidence for associations between fish consumption and risks of site-specific cancers1
Outcome | Primary studies, n | Cases, n | Comparison2 | Summary RR (95% CI) | P value3 | Quality of the evidence (NutriGrade) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liver cancer | 5 | 1572 | Per 100 g/d | 0.65 (0.48, 0.87) | 0.007 | Moderate |
Myeloid leukemia | 2 | 416 | High vs. low | 1.60 (1.10, 2.35) | 0.01 | Low |
Gastric cancer | 5 | 2813 | Per 100 g/d | 1.16 (1.00, 1.28) | 0.05 | Low |
Prostate cancer mortality | 4 | 740 | High vs. low | 0.37 (0.18, 0.74) | 0.005 | Low |
Bladder cancer | 5 | 1141 | High vs. low | 0.86 (0.53, 1.39) | 0.53 | Low |
Colorectal cancer | 20 | 19,787 | Per 100 g/d | 0.93 (0.85, 1.01) | 0.07 | Low |
Total cancer mortality | 10 | 49,952 | Per 100 g/d | 0.98 (0.91, 1.07) | 0.69 | Low |
Breast cancer | 11 | 13,323 | Per 100 g/d | 1.00 (0.81, 1.23) | 0.84 | Low |
Prostate cancer incidence | 12 | 13,924 | High vs. low | 1.02 (0.91, 1.15) | 0.69 | Low |
Ovarian cancer | 5 | 1288 | High vs. low | 1.04 (0.89, 1.22) | 0.60 | Low |
Pancreatic cancer | 13 | 4994 | Per 100 g/d | 1.06 (0.90, 1.25) | 0.42 | Low |
Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma | 3 | 726 | High vs. low | 0.87 (0.60, 1.27) | 0.47 | Very low |
Multiple myeloma | 3 | 986 | High vs. low | 0.94 (0.67, 1.33) | 0.87 | Very low |
Lung cancer | 3 | 11,624 | High vs. low | 0.95 (0.73, 1.24) | 0.69 | Very low |
CLL/SLL | 3 | 1370 | High vs. low | 0.99 (0.83, 1.19) | 0.74 | Very low |
Endometrial cancer | 4 | 2245 | Per 100 g/d | 1.00 (0.65, 1.61) | 0.56 | Very low |
Leukemia | 3 | 2536 | High vs. low | 1.02 (0.89, 1.17) | 0.43 | Very low |
Oral cancer | 2 | 226 | High vs. low | 1.03 (0.66, 1.61) | 0.90 | Very low |
Renal cancer | 3 | 2443 | High vs. low | 1.07 (0.81, 1.39) | 0.65 | Very low |
Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma | 4 | 3865 | High vs. low | 1.08 (0.94, 1.24) | 0.62 | Very low |
CLL, chronic lymphocytic leukemia; SLL, small lymphocytic lymphoma.
For meta-analyses that did not report dose-response estimation, the result of the highest compared with the lowest category was reported.
P < 0.00125 was considered significant to avoid inflating the rate of false-positive findings due to multiple testing.