Table 1.
Main characteristics of the studies included in the pooled analysis
| Study | Setting | Blood sample size, n (% females) | Age, years | Severe disease,% | RDW in severe vs. nonsevere disease, % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gong et al. [11] | China | 189 (48.1) | 49±8 | 14.8 | 12.75±0.31 vs. 12.22±0.33 (p < 0.01) |
| Levy et al. [12] | USA | 11,095 (41.3) | 65±7 | 23.4 | 14.20±0.77 vs. 13.50±0.31 (p < 0.001) |
| Wang et al. [13] | China | 161 (48.9) | 39±13 | 18.6 | 12.59±0.65 vs. 12.29±0.46 (p = 0.02) |
| Cumulative value | − | − | − | − | 14.17±0.55 vs. 13.48±0.36 (p < 0.001) |
Values are presented as means ± SD unless otherwise stated. RDW, red blood cell distribution width.