Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 31;4(8):e16727. doi: 10.2196/16727

Table 4.

Daily time in each Physical Activity intensity level (%) by different sets of cut points.

Activity intensity Hip reference Johansson wrist ROCa analysis OLRb model K-means analysis

Mean (SD) % Mean (SD) % Mean (SD) % Mean (SD) % Mean (SD) %
Sedentary behavior 148.07 (32.15) 57.8c 194.81 (41.58) 63.9 157.95 (37.88) 58.5c 208.61 (33.65) 76.1 138.13 (37.63) 51.6c
Light physical activity 83.13 (25.71) 30.4d 100.84 (39.53) 34.6d 47.47 (12.97) 16.7 60.11 (26.45) 21.2 89.25 (23.68) 31.3d
Moderate physical activity 19.27 (10.95) 7.1 N/A N/A 9.20 (3.44) 3.3 3.73 (2.18) 1.3 41.46 (19.87) 14.7
Vigorous physical activity 13.24 (20.74) 4.7e N/A N/A 60.84 (28.09) 21.5 3.82 (2.88) 1.4 6.74 (4.42) 2.4e
Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity 32.61 (30.78) 11.8 4.35 (3.16) 1.5 70.98 (61.63) 24.8 7.62 (4.77) 2.7 48.87 (23.47) 17.1

aROC: Receiver operating characteristic.

bOLR: Ordinal logistic regression.

c Indicates there is no statistical difference in PA estimate between the ML method and the hip-based reference for the Sedentary behavior intensity level.

d Indicates there is no statistical difference in PA estimate between the ML method and the hip-based reference for the Sedentary behavior intensity level.

e Indicates there is no statistical difference in PA estimate between the ML method and the hip-based reference for the Sedentary behavior intensity level.