Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 2;125(4):184–199. doi: 10.1038/s41437-020-0331-y

Table 3.

Comparison of models explaining the association between TLR4 constitution, ecological & landscape factors and Hepacivirus infection status (n = 149).

Models d.f. AICc Delta
1. Genetic models
Heterozygosity 2 166.415 31.467
TLR4_Ht1 2 166.174 31.226
TLR4_Ht2 2 166.434 31.486
TLR4_Ht3 2 162.109 27.161
TLR4_Ht4 2 162.178 27.230
2. Ecological & landscape model
Landscape, sex, age, density:sex ratio 7 136.798 1.850
3. Genetics & landscape models
TLR4_Ht3, landscape 4 134.948 0.000
TLR4_Ht4, landscape 4 135.717 0.769

Model were split into three different categories: (1) genetic models, investigating the effects of different TLR haplotypes and heterozygosity; (2) ecological & landscape model, investigating landscape, sex, age, and host population density in interaction with sex ratio as factors (Schmid et al. 2018); and (3) genetics & landscape models, combining genetic factors from the genetic models with landscape as a surrogate for ecological factors. The best model is shown in bold.