Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Aug 2;29(10):105083. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105083

Table 2:

Receipt of composite quality measure within 30 days between participants with pre-existing MCI and cognitively normal patients

Number of 4 procedures within composite quality measure received Participants with Pre-existing Normal Cognition (n=432) Participants with Pre-existing MCI (n=159) P-value Unadjusted cumulative odds ratios (95% CI) for MCI vs normal cognition Adjusted cumulative odds ratios (95% CI) for MCI vs normal cognition
0 40 (9.3) 19 (12.0) 0.03 0.61
(0.43–0.87)
P=0.006
0.83
(0.56–1.24)
P=0.37
1 88 (20.4) 48 (30.2)
2 257 (59.5) 80 (50.3)
3–4 47 (10.9) 12 (7.6)

Abbreviations: MCI, mild cognitive impairment.

The primary outcome was a composite quality measure representing the number of 4 procedures (carotid imaging, cardiac monitoring, echocardiogram, and rehabilitation assessment) received within 30 days after AIS (ordinal scale with values of 0, 1, 2, 3–4).

We combined the 2 categories corresponding to receiving 3 and 4 of the 4 procedures because only one individual received all 4 procedures resulting in a 4-level composite quality measure (values of 0, 1, 2, 3–4). Ordinal logistic regression models estimated the cumulative odds of receiving the composite quality measure (primary outcome) before and after adjusting for patient factors (age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, net wealth, income, Charlson comorbidity index score, depressive symptoms, functional limitations in basic and instrumental activities of daily living, marital status/living arrangement, geographic proximity to adult children, and having an adult daughter) and hospital factors (medical school affiliate or teaching hospital, region, bed size, and authority type).