Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 14;5(9):e002464. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002464

Table 1.

Characteristics of included articles

Study Article aim CVD Country (income level) Setting Sample Methodology Framework details
Barello et al27 Identify features and the levers of patient with HF engagement HF Italy (HIC) University Hospital in Milan 22 participants (13 patients, 5 physicians, 4 caregivers) Qualitative, SSI Grounded theory. Inductive, ‘Process of engagement in patients with HF’.
Bokhour et al28 Explore patients’ ‘explanatory models’ and context, relate to self-management HT USA (HIC) Medical centres 48 African-American, white and Latino patients/veterans Qualitative, SSI Grounded theory Inductive, ‘The dynamic model of HT self-management behaviour’.
Byrne et al18 Describe illness perceptions and beliefs about medication of patients CHD Ireland (HIC) General practice outpatients 1084 patients under the age of 80 Quantitative, cross-sectional, postal questionnaires Deductive, SRM modified to include treatment and medication beliefs.
Chen et al19 Test relationship between illness perception to self-management HT Taiwan (HIC) CVD clinics of teaching hospitals 355 patients Quantitative, cross-sectional, structured questionnaires Inductive/deductive: ‘Model for adherence to therapeutic regimens’, modified CSM.
Dickson et al 31 Examine contribution of attitudes, self-efficacy and cognition to management HF USA (HIC) Outpatients of medical centre 41 patients Mixed, qualitative SSI, quantitative cross-sectional survey Deductive, modified Decision-making model of HF management.
Fort et al 29 Present patients’ perceptions of barriers and facilitators to management HT and DB Costa Rica/Mexico (UMIC) Urban public health centres 70 patients Qualitative, focus group discussions Thematic analysis Deductive, TM.
Horowitz et al30 Elucidate patients' knowledge and beliefs, understand self-care routines CHF USA (HIC) Urban tertiary care hospital 19 former inpatients Qualitative, SSI, Grounded theory Inductive/deductive: models of CHF and CSM.
Kressin et al 20 Explore links between race, beliefs about HT and adherence. HT USA (HIC) Veteran's affairs hospital 793 outpatients (460 African-American, 333 white) Quantitative, cross-sectional structured questionnaires Deductive, adapted HDM combined with several other scales.
Luder et al 21 Describe features and beliefs of enrolees of employer-based DB and HT programme HT and DB USA (HIC) Pharmacies 154 enrolees of employer-led DB and HT coaching programme Quantitative, cross-sectional using survey Deductive, HBM, TPB and TRA.
Peleg et al 22 Assess role of attitudes, norms and behavioural control on adherence ACS Israel (HIC) Cardiac care units in urban hospitals 106 married/cohabitating male patients Quantitative, longitudinal surveys Deductive, TPB and Attachment Theory.
Platt et al 23 Examine adherence to medication, exercise and diet CHD Australia (HIC) Outpatient clinics 142 outpatients Quantitative, cross-sectional using questionnaire Deductive, CSM, TM and positive and negative affect.
Presseau et al 32 Compare approaches for identifying determinants of adherence post-MI MI Canada (HIC) Hospitals 24 outpatients for qualitative, 201 for quantitative Mixed, qualitative SSI, quantitative: structured surveys Deductive, TDF and HAPA.
Quine et al 24 Propose and test a model of adherence to antihypertensive medication HT UK (HIC) Primary care 934 outpatients at 1 of 3 practices Quantitative, prospective longitudinal using two surveys Inductive, a conceptual model of adherence to HT medication.
Sniehotta et al 25 Test, compare, combine CSM and extended TPB CHD UK (HIC) Hospitals, patient homes 103 outpatients in phase III cardiac rehabilitation Quantitative, prospective cohort design Deductive, CSM and TPB.
Vellone et al 26 Test situation-specific theory of HF self-care with modelling HF Italy (HIC) Outpatient settings 417 outpatients aged 18 years and older Quantitative, secondary analysis of data from cross-sectional study Deductive, situation-specific theory of HF.

ACS, acute coronary syndrome; BP, blood pressure; CHD, coronary heart disease; CHF, congestive heart failure; CSM, common-sense self-regulation model; DB, diabetes; HAPA, health action process approach; HBM, health belief model; HDM, health decision model; HF, heart failure; HIC, high-income economy; HT, hypertension; LMIC, low-income to middle-income economy; MI, myocardial infarction; SRM, self-regulatory model; SSI, semi-structured interview; TDF, theoretical domains framework; TM, transtheoretical model; TPB, theory of planned behaviour; TRA, theory of reasoned action; UMIC, upper-income to middle-income economy.