Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 31;37:100718. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2020.100718

Table 4.

Genome comparison between three new bacterial strains and closely related species using GGDC and formula 2 (dDDH estimates based on identities over HSP length), upper right. The inherent uncertainty in assigning dDDH values from intergenomic distances is presented in the form of confidence intervals

Bdak Bmas Bsin Baci Bcic Bcir Bfir Bnov Btim
Bdak 100% 24.3% ± 4.8 27.5% ± 4.9 28.4% ± 4.9 24.5% ± 4.8 28.5% ± 4.9 22.7% ± 4.7 24.3% ± 4.8 23.2% ± 4.8
Bmas 100% 31.5% ± 4.9 32.1% ± 4.9 37.6% ± 5 30.3% ± 4.9 22.0% ± 4.7 26.3% ± 4.8 25.9% ± 4.8
Bsin 100% 34.9% ± 4.9 27.8% ± 4.8 27.1% ± 4.8 26.4% ± 4.9 32.1% ± 5 23.8% ± 4.7
Baci 100% 32.7% ± 4.9 33.9% ± 4.9 27.3% ± 4.9 29.3% ± 4.9 29.3% ± 4.9
Bcic 100% 28.9% ± 4.8 21.5% ± 4.7 25.6% ± 4.8 25.0% ± 4.8
Bcir 100% 23.4% ± 4.8 32.6% ± 4.9 25.0% ± 4.8
Bfir 100% 22.2% ± 4.7 22.6% ± 4.7
Bnov 100% 26.2% ± 4.8
Btim 100%

dDDH, digital DNA–DNA hybridization; HSP, high scoring pair; GGDC, genome-to-genome distance calculator.

Bacillus dakarensis strain Marseille-P3515T (Bdak), Bacillus massiliogabonensis strain Marseille-P2639T (Bmas), Bacillus sinesaloumensis strain Marseille-P3516T (Bsin), Bacillus acidicola strain DSM 14745T (Baci), Bacillus ciccensis strain KCTC 33663T (Bcic), Bacillus circulans strain NBRC 13626 (Bcir), Bacillus firmus strain NBRC 15306 (Bfir), Bacillus novalis strain NBRC 102450 (Bnov) and Bacillus timonensis strain Marseille-P162 (Btim).