Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 15;19(3):350–359. doi: 10.1002/wps.20772

Table 4.

Models and model fit statistics

χ2 df CFI BIC Model compared to ΔBIC
1. One common factor 1052 77 0.71 1427.0
2. Three correlated factors (EXT, INT and TP) 554 74 0.86 969.3 1 457.7
3. Four correlated factors (EXT, INT, TP and SUD) 548 71 0.86 1003.5 2 +34.2
4. Four factor model (EXT, INT, TP and uncorrelated NDD) 419 71 0.90 874.5 2 94.8
5. Four correlated factors (EXT, INT, TP and NDD; ED on INT) 385 71 0.91 840.5 4 34.0
6. Bifactor model, with four uncorrelated specific factors (ED on INT only) 400 63 0.90 962.7 5 +122.2
Modified four correlated factors models
5a. Four correlated factors, BIP on TP and EXT 384 70 0.91 852.9 5 12.4
5b. Four correlated factors, BIP on TP and INT 383 70 0.91 851.9 5 11.4
5c. Four correlated factors, OCD on TP and INT 385 70 0.91 853.9 5 13.4
5d. Four correlated factors, OCD on INT only 402 71 0.90 857.5 5 17.0
5e. Four correlated factors, MDD on INT and TP 382 70 0.91 850.9 5 10.4
5f. Four correlated factors, ED on INT and EXT model would not run
5g. Four correlated factors, ED on INT and TP 341 70 0.92 809.9 5 30.6
5h. Four correlated factors, ED on TP only 341 71 0.92 796.5 5 44.0
5i. Bifactor model, with four uncorrelated specific factors (ED on TP only) 366 63 0.91 928.7 5h +132.2

CFI – comparative fit index, BIC – Bayesian information criterion, EXT – externalizing factor, INT – internalizing factor, TP – thought problems factor, SUD – substance use disorders factor, NDD – neurodevelopmental disorders factor, BIP – bipolar disorder, OCD – obsessive‐compulsive disorder, MDD – major ‐depressive disorder, ED – eating disorders. The model in bold is the best‐fitting model based on a BIC difference >10. ΔBICs that have plus signs indicate that the more parsimonious models have better fit than the more complex models.