Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Inf Model. 2012 Feb 21;52(3):739–756. doi: 10.1021/ci200595n

Table 3.

Consecutive Filtering of the 405,840 2009 Ligand Expo Ligand Instances and of the HQ-R Set, with Progression from Strongest to Weakest Filtera

filter name number of ligand instances percentage of ligand instances number of ligand instances (HQ-R set) number of compound IDs (HQ-R set) number of PDB entries (HQ-R set)
FICuS 122179 30.1 415 152 396
resolution 61508 15.2 415 152 396
DPI 44929 11.1 319 115 301
RSCC 27125 6.7 203 87 191
RSR 25291 6.2 199 86 187
rotor count (lower limit) 12437 3.1 199 86 187
titratable groups 6781 1.7 199 86 187
R 5193 1.3 151 74 145
bioligand 767 0.2 151 74 145
OWAB value (upper limit) 750 0.2 151 74 145
covalent 581 0.1 145 71 139
charged atoms 549 0.1 145 71 139
tautomers 343 0.1 98 41 94
mean B value 343 0.1 98 41 94
OWAB value (lower limit) 343 0.1 98 41 94
macromolecule type 342 0.1 98 41 94
X-ray 342 0.1 98 41 94
rotor count (upper limit) 336 0.1 98 41 94
disorder flag 309 0.1 98 41 94
refinement program 309 0.1 98 41 94
macromolecule 309 0.1 98 41 94
close contact 309 0.1 98 41 94
a

See Table 1; filters “FICTS” and “uuuuu” omitted, see text. All numerical values given are the fractions of the ligand instances, component IDs, and PDB entries, respectively, that passed the specific filter.