Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 15.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Oncol. 2020 Jan;31(1):88–95. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2019.10.005

Table 3.

Survival and incidence of any-grade CIN in FTD/TPI-treated patients who experienced treatment delays in RECOURSEa

n (%)b Median OS, months OS HR versus placebo (95% CI) OS HR versus no delay (95% CI) Median PFS, months PFS HR versus placebo (95% CI) PFS HR versus no delay (95% CI) Patients with CIN, n (%)c CIN RRd (95% CI)
≥8 days (n = 533) 108 (20.3) 14.4 0.31 (0.23–0.40)* 0.18 (0.13–0.25)* 5.8 0.16 (0.12–0.22)* 0.16 (0.12–0.22)*   96 (88.9) 1.88 (1.64–2.16)*
≥4 and <8 days (n = 533) 137 (25.7) 9.7 0.51 (0.41–0.64)* 0.31 (0.23–0.40)* 3.7 0.33 (0.26–0.41)* 0.33 (0.26–0.42)* 121 (88.3) 1.87 (1.63–2.14)*
None (n = 533) 288 (54.0) 4.9 1.21 (1.01–1.44)**    — 1.8 0.94 (0.78–1.12)    — 136 (47.2)    —
Placebo (n = 265)e 265 (100) 5.3    —    — 1.7    —    —  2 (0.8)    —

CI, confidence interval; CIN, chemotherapy-induced neutropenia; FTD, trifluridine; HR, hazard ratio; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; RR, relative risk; TPI, tipiracil.

a

Across all cycles, 289 patients (54.2%) in the FTD/TPI group had adverse events that resulted in interruptions in dosing, dose delays, and/or dose reductions compared with 36 patients (13.6%) in the placebo group.

b

Percentage of as-treated population in the specific treatment group.

c

Treatment delays may or may not be related to a specific neutropenic event.

d

Relative risk versus no delay.

e

Includes 14 placebo patients (5.3%) who experienced some cycle delay of ≥4 days.

*

Indicates significant (P < 0.05) improvement in survival for the extent of the dose delay group versus the placebo group.

**

Indicates significant (P < 0.05) improvement in survival for the placebo group versus the extent of the dose delay group.