Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 1;40(5):722–733. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2020.e47

Table 4. Textural profile properties of pork regular-fat sausages as affected by different drying methods and levels of grape tomato powder.

Parameters
Hardness (N) Springiness (mm) Gumminess (kg/mm) Chewiness (kg/mm) Cohesiveness
Treatments
 CTL 38.64a 6.25b 24.7a 146a 8.65b
 REF 25.71e 5.85c 22.6ab 117bc 8.12c
 F1 26.30e 5.74c 22.7ab 117c 8.27c
 F2 28.43d 6.28b 21.0b 115c 7.78d
 O1 30.27c 6.37b 23.8a 125b 8.17c
 O2 32.52b 6.65a 26.3a 121bc 9.78a
Days
 0 27.67D 6.29A 21.4C 118B 8.75A
 3 31.88A 6.03C 25.4A 138A 8.53AB
 7 29.93C 6.12BC 22.0BC 118B 8.32B
 14 30.58BC 6.11BC 23.3ABC 122B 8.38B
 21 30.63BC 6.31A 22.9BC 122B 8.42AB
 28 31.19AB 6.27AB 24.3AB 123B 8.38B
a–d

Mean with different superscripts in treatment are different (p<0.05).

A–D

Mean with different superscripts in the storage time are different (p<0.05).

CTL, control; REF, reference (0.1% Ascorbic acid); F1, sausages mixed with 0.25% of freeze drying grape tomato powder (≤150 μm mesh) (F1GTPSs); F2, sausages mixed with 0.5% of freeze drying grape tomato powder (≤150 μm mesh) (F2GTPSs); O1, sausages mixed with 0.25% of oven dried grape tomato powder (≤150 μm mesh) at 100°C oven (O1GTPSs); O2, sausages mixed with 0.5% of oven dried grape tomato powder (≤150 μm mesh) at 100°C oven (O2GTPSs).