Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 18;37(9):2249–2257. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01877-5

Table 1.

Comparison between normozoospermic frozen samples exposed to microgravity (μg) and the control group maintained on earth conditions (1 g): sperm concentration and motility after thawing

μg 1 g
Mean ± SD [Range] Mean ± SD [Range] DIF [95% CI]
Total sperm concentration (M/ml) 39.01 ± 32.02 [11.04–115.90] 39.29 ± 36.53 [8.90–127.74] 0.28 [−3.40; 3.96]
Motile sperm concentration (M/ml) 13.72 ± 12.57 [1.20–43.58] 13.03 ± 12.13 [0.86–37.86] − 0.69 [− 2.9; 1.52]
% Motility 32.82 ± 14.19 [10.85–50.18] 32.27 ± 15.84 [9.77–62.28] 0.09 [− 0.12; –0.30]
Grade a sperm concentration (M/ml) 5.80 ± 6.40 [0.25–23.74] 5.22 ± 5.58 [0.36–21.03] − 0.58 [− 1.28; 0.12]
Grade b sperm concentration (M/ml) 3.46 ± 3.15 [0.20–9.70] 4.03 ± 4.16 [0.19–14.67] 0.58 [− 0.96; 2.11]
Grade c sperm concentration (M/ml) 4.47 ± 4.18 [0.36–13.93] 3.78 ± 3.22 [0.32–9.52] − 0.69 [− 1.93; 0.55]
Progressive motility (a + b) (%) 21.83 ± 11.69 [5.35–37.37] 22.54 ± 12.83 [6.21–45.10] 0.03 [− 0.08; 0.15]