Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 2;11:1298. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.01298

Table 5.

Transformation results from screening of six different inducible promoters driving Cre expression for controlled gene excision.

Promoter Control 37°C, 1 day 42°C, 2 h/day for 3 days
Embryos T0 plants Single copy event (number) QE Excision frequency Embryos T0 plants Single copy event (number) QE Excision frequency (%) Embryos T0 plants Single copy event (number) QE Excision frequency (%)
(%)
Hsp17.7 455 59 18 5 27.8 50 6 3 2 66.7 50 20 4 4 100
Hsp26 450 98 0 0 0 50 5 0 0 0 50 21 7 3 43
Rab17 455 127 29 1 3.4 50 10 0 0 0 50 18 0 0 0
Rab21 455 101 22 8 36.4 50 13 1 1 100 50 20 0 0 0
Drp12 450 79 18 2 11.1 50 16 0 0 0 50 22 3 2 66.7
Drp1 438 90 29 8 27.6 50 8 0 0 0 50 27 11 5 45.5
Control (no Cre) 450 182 0 0

Data from two independent transformers was used to determine T0 transformation frequency. The quality events (QE) were identified as single copy, backbone-free, and morphogenic gene-free (excised). The excision frequency was determined as the ratio of the number of excised single-copy events relative to the total single-copy events.

For this study, three different conditions were evaluated: two heat shock treatments (37°C for 1 day and 42°C, 2 h/day for 3 consecutive days) and no heat (control). Data presents the qPCR detection of the number of excised events and excision frequency across the different promoters, and a control construct without the Cre gene, in maize inbred HC69.