Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 2;11:573150. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.573150

Table 3.

Subgroup analyses presenting several factors associated with the prevalence of CMDs in included in studies.

Group Pooled prevalence Lower limit Upper limit Q-value df (Q) P-value
Method for identification of CMD
Diagnostic 5.22% 4.27% 6.37% 139.23 1.00 <0.001
Questionnaire 19.14% 17.38% 21.02%
Study setting
Community 13.05% 11.74% 14.49% 31.71 3.00 <0.001
Healthcare setting 29.01% 21.25% 38.24%
Other 26.53% 17.38% 38.26%
Refugee Settings 7.19% 3.19% 15.40%
Sampling Method
Non-random 19.0% 16.4% 21.9% 26.18 1.00 <0.001
Random 11/4% 10% 12.9%
Study design
Cross-sectional 13.93% 12.61% 15.35% 7.62 1.00 0.01
Longitudinal 30.52% 17.91% 46.94%
Background of participants
Mixed 14.37% 12.04% 17.06% 56.40 5.00 <0.001
National 18.18% 12.58% 25.53%
Provincial 1.91% 1.03% 3.51%
Rural 14.12% 10.96% 18.00%
Semi-urban 36.58% 13.84% 67.43%
Urban 17.47% 15.05% 20.18%