Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct;32(10):674–684. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.05.003

Table 2.

Univariable and multivariable survival analysis

Univariable survival analysis Multivariable analysis Multivariable analysis
NSCLC + SCLC cohort NSCLC + SCLC cohort NSCLC-only cohort
N = 422, E = 367 N = 327, E = 284
Covariat N (E) Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) P-value Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) P-value Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) P-value
Sex
 Female (reference) 925 (816) 1 1 1
 versus male 1.14 (0.99–1.31) 0.06 1.03 (0.83–1.27) 0.82 0.95 (0.74–1.22) 0.67
Age 925 (816) 1.00 (1.00–1.01) 0.35 1.00 (0.99–1.01) 0.85 0.99 (0.98–1.01) 0.48
Performance status
 Good (0–1) versus mid (2) versus poor (3–4) 925 (816) 1.32 (1.21–1.45) <0.001 1.22 (1.05–1.42) 0.01 1.25 (1.05–1.49) 0.01
Histology
 Adenocarcinoma (reference) 925 (816) 1 1 1
 versus adenosquamous 1.25 (0.59–2.65) 0.56 1.51 (0.55–4.17) 0.42 1.54 (0.56–4.26) 0.41
 versus large cell 0.68 (0.36–1.28) 0.24 0.91 (0.42–2.01) 0.82 0.84 (0.38–1.87) 0.67
 versus squamous cell 1.00 (0.85–1.18) 0.98 1.06 (0.83–1.36) 0.62 1.08 (0.84–1.39) 0.56
 versus small cell 0.80 (0.68–0.96) 0.02 0.76 (0.56–1.01) 0.06 NA NA
Comorbidities
 0 versus 1 versus 2 versus 3 776 (673) 1.09 (1.02–1.18) 0.02 1.06 (0.94–1.18) 0.34 1.08 (0.94–1.23) 0.27
Combined TNM stage
 IV (reference) 721 (642) 1 1 1
 versus III 0.89 (0.74–1.08) 0.23 0.98 (0.75–1.28) 0.87 1.05 (0.76–1.43) 0.78
 versus I+II 1.03 (0.63–1.67) 0.92 0.74 (0.38–1.44) 0.38 0.70 (0.33–1.49) 0.36
Tumour location
 Lower lobe (reference) 823 (720) 1 1 1
 versus middle lobe 0.87 (0.64–1.17) 0.35 1.83 (0.79–4.23) 0.16 1.37 (0.49–3.79) 0.55
 versus upper lobe 0.93 (0.80–1.11) 0.46 0.90 (0.71–1.14) 0.36 0.87 (0.67–1.14) 0.32
Tumour side
 Left (reference) 763 (669) 1 1 1
 versus right 0.99 (0.85–1.15) 0.88 1.04 (0.83–1.29) 0.75 0.98 (0.76–1.25) 0.85
Smoking status
 Current smoker (reference) 766 (663) 1 1 1
 versus light former 0.88 (0.36–2.14) 0.78 0.42 (0.13–1.39) 0.16 0.43 (0.13–1.43) 0.17
 versus ex-smoker 0.92 (0.78–1.08) 0.31 0.95 (0.75–1.21) 0.69 0.98 (0.74–1.29) 0.88
 versus lifelong never 0.57 (0.37–0.89) 0.01 NA NA NA NA
Pack years 691 (598) 1.00 (1.00–1.01) 0.4 1.00 (0.99–1.00) 0.59 1.00 (0.99–1.00) 0.30
Fractionation scheme
 30 Gy/10F versus 20 Gy/5F versus 8 + 10 Gy/1F 925 (816) 1.73 (1.56–1.91) <0.001 1.48 (1.23–1.77) <0.001 1.54 (1.25–1.89) <0.001
Primary radiotherapy technique
 IMRT (reference) 925 (816) 1 1
 versus parallel pair and two field 2.03 (0.29–14.41) 0.48 2.03 (0.28–14.86) 0.49 2.30 (0.31–17.05) 0.42
 versus single field 2.13 (0.29–15.74) 0.46 2.03 (0.25–16.50) 0.51 2.23 (0.27–18.30) 0.46
 versus 3+ field 1.64 (0.19–14.06) 0.65 1.54 (0.16–15.15) 0.71 1.83 (0.18–18.15) 0.61

IMRT, intensity-modulated radiotherapy; N, number of patients; E, number of events.

There were no lifelong never smokers when performing a complete case analysis.