Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 14;6(9):e04831. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04831

Table 3.

Construct validity of MSMR through CFA loadings.

Measures Factor
1 2 3
Sample One – Three-Factor Model
 MSMR-IR .628 .177 .677
 MSMR-CP .749 .261 .841
 MSMR-ER .993 .159 .664
 CD-RISC .522 .475 .904
 RS .429 .499 .863
 BPFI .144 .995 .525

Sample One – Two-Factor Model
 MSMR-IR -- .999 .663
 MSMR-CP -- .644 .806
 CD-RISC -- .568 .948
 RS -- .545 .836

Sample Two – Three-Factor Model
 MSMR-IR .054 .749 .642
 MSMR-CP .197 .267 .842
 MSMR-ER .650 .082 .727
 CD-RISC -.011 -.105 .948
 RS -.272 -.105 .912

Sample Two – Two-Factor Model
 MSMR-IR -- .771 .582
 MSMR-CP -- .413 .811
 CD-RISC -- .017 .952
 RS -- -.122 .931

Note. MSMR = Multi-System Model of Resilience; IR = Internal Resilience; CP = Coping Pursuits; ER = External Resilience; CD-RISC = Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale 25; BPFI = Baruth Protective Factor Inventory; RS = Resilience Scale. Factor loadings are bolded.