Table 2.
LASER ASSISTED BIOPRINTING | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S No. | Studied by | Type of construct | Model used | Outcome | |
1 | Williams et al. (2005)45 | Porous PCL mandibular condyle scaffold | Pigs | Compressive modulus and yield strength values ranged from 52 to 67 MPa, 2.0–3.2 MPa. Bone formation in-vivo observed. | |
2 | Smith et al. (2007)46 | PCL based condylar ramus unit scaffold for TMJ reconstruction with BMP7. | Pigs | Cartilaginous tissue regeneration along the articulating surface with exuberant osseous tissue formation. Significant new bone growth interior and exterior to the scaffold seen. | |
3 | Zhang et al. (2015)42 | HA/epoxide acrylate maleic artificial implants for craniomaxillofacial bone defects. | Human | Improved aesthetic Results and functional recovery after reconstruction. | |
4 | Zopf et al. (2016)92 | Subcutaneous PCL auricular and nasal scaffolds | Porcine | Excellent appearance and complete soft tissue ingrowth. In-vitro histologic analysis of scaffolds showed native appearing cartilaginous growth respecting the boundaries of scaffold | |
5 | Adamzyk et al. (2016)49 | High performance thermoplastic PEKK scaffolds along with Humans and sheep MSCs in calvarial defects | Sheep | 3D PEKK scaffolds were cyto- and bio-compatible and exhibited adherence, growth and osteogenic differentiation with newly formed bone, a fibrous capsule around implants. | |
6 | Roskies et al. (2017)40 | 3D-printed PEKK scaffolds combined with Adipose-derived stem cells in critical-sized mandibular defect | Rabbits | Improved bone-implant interface and increased resistance to forces of mastication after mandibular reconstruction. | |
7 |
Lin et al. (2019)50 |
3D-printed PEKK scaffolds along with Human synovial fluid MSCs (hSF-MSCs) for calvarial critical-sized bone defects |
Rabbits |
In-vitro, hSF-MSCs attached, proliferated, and were osteogenic on PEKK In-vivo twice the amount of newly formed bone when compared to PEKK seeded with osteogenically-induced hSF-MSCs or PEKK scaffolds alone. |
|
INKJET/DROPLET BIOPRINTING | |||||
1 | Lee et al. (2005)104 | Anatomically shaped Zygoma scaffolds of PCL/HA | In-vitro | Intestinal epithelial cell attached to scaffolds uniformly, grew preferentially in villi region. | |
2 | Saijo et al. (2009)78 | Alpha-tricalcium phosphate powder scaffolds for maxillofacial deformities. | Human | Partial union between the artificial bones and host bone tissues was seen. | |
3 | Cooper et al. (2010)54 | Circular Derma Matrix human allograft scaffold constructs with BMP2 for calvarial defect model. | Mice | Patterns of bone formation in vivo were comparable with patterned responses of osteoblastic differentiation in vitro | |
4 |
Lee et al. (2013)103 |
Custom scaffolds with orthogonal interconnected channels to mimic human mandibular condyle using PCL, chitosan with HA coating for osteochondral tissue engineering |
In vitro |
Bone marrow stromal cells (BMSC) showed good viability in the scaffolds, and the apatite coating further enhanced cellular spreading and proliferation. |
|
EXTRUSION BASED BIOPRINTING | |||||
1 | Kuss et al. (2017)105 | Bone constructs of PCL/HA and SVF derived cell (SVFC)-laden hydrogel bioink | Mice | Microvessel formation in vitro and in vivo, integration with existing host vasculature along with osteogenic differentiation of SVFC. | |
2 | Kang et al. (2016)9 | Cell laden hydrogels to construct mandible, calvarial scaffolds. | In vitro | Successful fabrication of mandible and calvarial bone, cartilage and skeletal muscle. |