Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 15;20:226. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01246-3

Table 5.

Comparison of the median scores for the included instruments at baseline, at the end of the intervention and at 6-month follow-up (N = 17)

Instruments Range Median (Q1-Q3)
Baseline End of intervention 6-month follow-up P-valuea P-valueb P-valuec P-valued
SOC scale 13–91 63 (59–70)γ 66 (59.7–74.5)β 64 (59–73)π 0.08’ 0.75’ 0.07’ 0.11
HI 9–36 24 (23–28.7)β 24.5 (21.2–28)β 25 (22–28)π 0.50’ 0.06’ 0.17’ 0.33
NUFFE 0–30 6 (4–9.5)γ 8 (4.5–9.5)γ 7 (5–9)π 0.30’ 0.52’ 0.13’ 0.65
GDS 0–20 3 (2.2–5.5)ε 5 (2–9)π 5 (4–8)π 0.12α 0.21α 1.00α 0.15

GDS Geriatric Depression Scale, HI Health Index, NUFFE Nutritional Form for the Elderly, SOC Sense of Coherence. Q1 = first quartile; Q3 = third quartile

aBaseline vs end of the intervention; bBaseline vs 6-month follow-up; cEnd of the intervention vs 6-month follow-up; dComparison over time the three assessments points

Wilcoxon signed rank test; Friedman’s test; Cochran’s Q-test; αMcNemar’s test

γn = 17; βn = 16; πn = 15; εn = 12