Table 5.
Comparison of the median scores for the included instruments at baseline, at the end of the intervention and at 6-month follow-up (N = 17)
Instruments | Range | Median (Q1-Q3) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | End of intervention | 6-month follow-up | P-valuea | P-valueb | P-valuec | P-valued | ||
SOC scale | 13–91 | 63 (59–70)γ | 66 (59.7–74.5)β | 64 (59–73)π | 0.08’ | 0.75’ | 0.07’ | 0.11▫ |
HI | 9–36 | 24 (23–28.7)β | 24.5 (21.2–28)β | 25 (22–28)π | 0.50’ | 0.06’ | 0.17’ | 0.33▫ |
NUFFE | 0–30 | 6 (4–9.5)γ | 8 (4.5–9.5)γ | 7 (5–9)π | 0.30’ | 0.52’ | 0.13’ | 0.65▫ |
GDS | 0–20 | 3 (2.2–5.5)ε | 5 (2–9)π | 5 (4–8)π | 0.12α | 0.21α | 1.00α | 0.15∞ |
GDS Geriatric Depression Scale, HI Health Index, NUFFE Nutritional Form for the Elderly, SOC Sense of Coherence. Q1 = first quartile; Q3 = third quartile
aBaseline vs end of the intervention; bBaseline vs 6-month follow-up; cEnd of the intervention vs 6-month follow-up; dComparison over time the three assessments points
‘Wilcoxon signed rank test; ▫Friedman’s test; ∞Cochran’s Q-test; αMcNemar’s test
γn = 17; βn = 16; πn = 15; εn = 12