Table 6.
The participants’ (N = 17) levels of health literacy at baseline, at the end of the intervention and at 6-month follow-up
| Health literacy levels | Time points | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline n |
End of intervention n |
6-month follow-up n | P-valuea | P-valueb | P-valuec | P-valued | |
| Swedish FHL scale, n | 1.00’ | 0.73’ | 0.48’ | 0.77▫ | |||
| Sufficient | 5 | 3 | 4 | ||||
| Problematic | 9 | 13 | 7 | ||||
| Inadequate | 3 | 1 | 4 | ||||
| Missing | 0 | 0 | 2 | ||||
| Swedish C & C HL scale, n | 0.25’ | 0.02’ | 0.02’ | 0.01▫ | |||
| Sufficient | 2 | 3 | 8 | ||||
| Problematic | 9 | 9 | 3 | ||||
| Inadequate | 5 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| Missing | 1 | 2 | 3 |
FHL Functional Health Literacy, C & C HL Communicative and Critical Health Literacy
aBaseline vs end of the intervention; bBaseline vs 6-month follow-up; cEnd of the intervention vs 6-month follow-up; dComparison between all three assessment points
‘Wilcoxon signed rank test; ▫Friedman’s test