Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 10;19:1534735420946834. doi: 10.1177/1534735420946834

Table 6.

Main Effect of Self-Regulatory BCTs on Exercise Adherence in the Phys-Can Study.

Adherence n B (95%CI)* P-Value
Supervised resistance training
 Overall 577 −0.6 (−5.6; 4.4) .81
 Frequency 577 −0.6 (−5.7; 4.6) .83
 Intensity 577 2.8 (−3.3; 8.9) .37
 Time 577 3.1 (−3.1; 9.2) .33
 Type 577 2.9 (−3.9; 9.7) .40
Home-based endurance training
 Overall 577 1.9 (−3.9; 7.6) .52
 Frequency 288 −3.4 (−11.0; 4.5) .40
 Intensity 288 −4.5 (−12.4; 3.4) .27
 Time 288 −1.4 (−10.0; 7.1) .74
 Type 288 0.4 (−8.2; 9.0) .92
Dropout rates 577 0.08 (−0.3; 0.4) .66

Abbreviations: BCTs, Behavior change techniques; Phys-Can, Physical Training and Cancer; CI, Confidence Intervals.

Regression analyses were adjusted for exercise intensity, interaction (intensity × BCTs), study site and diagnosis when the four intervention groups were included in the analyses (=577). The analyses were adjusted for study site and diagnosis when the HI intervention groups only were included in the analyses (n = 288).

*

Unstandardized coefficients represent the mean difference in adherence (%) due to the main effect of self-regulatory BCTs.