Table 6.
Main Effect of Self-Regulatory BCTs on Exercise Adherence in the Phys-Can Study.
Adherence | n | B (95%CI)* | P-Value |
---|---|---|---|
Supervised resistance training | |||
Overall | 577 | −0.6 (−5.6; 4.4) | .81 |
Frequency | 577 | −0.6 (−5.7; 4.6) | .83 |
Intensity | 577 | 2.8 (−3.3; 8.9) | .37 |
Time | 577 | 3.1 (−3.1; 9.2) | .33 |
Type | 577 | 2.9 (−3.9; 9.7) | .40 |
Home-based endurance training | |||
Overall | 577 | 1.9 (−3.9; 7.6) | .52 |
Frequency | 288 | −3.4 (−11.0; 4.5) | .40 |
Intensity | 288 | −4.5 (−12.4; 3.4) | .27 |
Time | 288 | −1.4 (−10.0; 7.1) | .74 |
Type | 288 | 0.4 (−8.2; 9.0) | .92 |
Dropout rates | 577 | 0.08 (−0.3; 0.4) | .66 |
Abbreviations: BCTs, Behavior change techniques; Phys-Can, Physical Training and Cancer; CI, Confidence Intervals.
Regression analyses were adjusted for exercise intensity, interaction (intensity × BCTs), study site and diagnosis when the four intervention groups were included in the analyses (=577). The analyses were adjusted for study site and diagnosis when the HI intervention groups only were included in the analyses (n = 288).
Unstandardized coefficients represent the mean difference in adherence (%) due to the main effect of self-regulatory BCTs.