Table 3.

Estimates of fixed effects for the outcome of posttest formal team communications score

Fixed effectsa	Level	Estimate (standard error)	P	95% confidence interval
1. Baseline formal team communications score	Continuous	0.24 (0.10)	0.02*	0.03 to 0.44
2. Study arm	Basic-assisted feedback	0.11 (0.07)	0.14	− 0.04 to 0.25
	Enhanced-assisted feedback	Reference	.
3. Number of workshops attended	2		.
	3		.
4. Continuity of representation at workshops	No	0.02 (0.08)	0.76	− 0.14 to 0.19
	Yes	Reference	.
5. Interteam activities delivered (workshop 2)	No	− 0.09 (0.08)	0.30	− 0.26 to 0.08
	Missing		.
	Yes	Reference	.
6. Interteam activities delivered (workshop 3)	No	− 0.01 (0.10)	0.95	− 0.20 to 0.19
	Missing	0.09 (0.16)	0.58	− 0.23 to 0.42
	Yes	Reference	.
7. Relevance of 1st workshop content:	Agree	− 0.16 (0.08)	0.04*	− 0.31 to − 0.01
	Strongly Agree	Reference	.
8. Team defined an appropriate goal at close of workshop 1	No	0.18 (0.14)	0.21	− 0.10 to 0.46
	Missing	0.03 (0.10)	0.78	− 0.17 to 0.23
	Yes	Reference	.
9. Team defined strategies for goal attainment at close of workshop 1	No	0.14 (0.23)	0.55	− 0.32 to 0.60
	Missing		.
	Yes	Reference	.
10. Team defined measures for tracking goal progress at close of workshop 1	No	− 0.20 (0.15)	0.17	− 0.49 to 0.09
	Missing		.
	Yes	Reference	.
11. Team measured impact of changes designed to improve formal team communications at workshop two	No	− 0.34 (0.14)	0.02*	− 0.62 to − 0.07
	Missing	Reference	.
	Yes	− 0.27 (0.13)	0.04*	− 0.52 to − 0.01
12. Average h/week manager spent planning INFORM activities:	< 1 h per week	− 0.01 (0.10)	0.91	− 0.22 to 0.20
	1–2 h per week	− 0.06 (0.10)	0.52	− 0.26 to 0.13
	Missing	0.01 (0.15)	0.93	− 0.29 to 0.32
	≥ 3 h per week	Reference	.

^aThe variable % of teams that completed preworkshop 1 exercise was excluded from the mixed model due to very low variance—see Table 2

Note: Level = “Missing” refers to the group of teams that were absent from the workshop at which those variables were measured

*Significant, P<0.05