Table 1. Summary of Experimental Conditions for Case Studies 1 and 2a.
| case study | experiment | w10 [102 g g–1] | wsat,10 [102 g g–1] | S0 | Tcryst [°C] | Tsat [°C] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1b: threonine in water | I(1) | 8.10 | 7.40 | 1.09 | 18 | 24.5 |
| II(1) | 8.39 | 7.40 | 1.14 | 18 | 27.5 | |
| III(1) | 8.71 | 7.40 | 1.17 | 18 | 30.5 | |
| IV(1) | 8.88 | 7.40 | 1.20 | 18 | 33 | |
| V(1) | 10.14 | 7.40 | 1.37 | 18 | 44 | |
| 2c: asparagine monohydrate in water | I(2) | 4.56 | 3.68 | 1.24 | 30 | 35 |
| II(2) | 4.95 | 3.68 | 1.34 | 30 | 37 | |
| III(2) | 5.57 | 3.68 | 1.51 | 30 | 40 | |
| IV(2) | 3.68 | 2.93 | 1.26 | 25 | 30 |
Experiments I(1)–III(1) and I(2)–III(2) were used for parameter estimation. Experiments IV(1) and V(1) were used to validate the range of application of the model and experiment IV(2) to study the influence of temperature in SCM parameters. In case study 1, mseeds = 1 g and VL = 0.5 L, and in case study 2, mseeds = 0.2 g, VL = 0.2 l. w10 = initial conc. of target enantiomer (solubility at Tsat); wsat,1 was calculated from the TPD (Figure 1) using wα. The initial solution was always racemic (w10 = w12(Tsat)/2).
Experiments simulated with PBM.45