. 2020 Sep 2;11:558855. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.558855

Table 4.

Simulated mean final emergence rates (% ± standard deviation; n = 10) of the three soybean cultivars used in this study across different locations and sowing dates.

Location	Cultivar	2013		2014
Location	Cultivar	ES	CS	ES	CS
En Crambade	Ecudor	86^a ± 0.52	87^ab ± 0.28	79^c ± 1	63^c ± 2
	Isidor	87^a ± 1	88^b ± 0.58	71^a ± 0.90	52^a ± 1.34
	Santana	86^a ± 1	86^a ± 0.83	75^b ± 0.76	59^b ± 1.13
Mondonville	Ecudor	49^a ± 1.61	84^ab ± 0.46	NT	65^b ± 0.89
	Isidor	51^a ± 1.55	85^b ± 0.65	NT	57^a ± 0.75
	Santana	51^a ± 0.6	83^a ± 0.85	NT	64^b ± 0.74
Rivières	Ecudor	62^a ± 1.12	81^a ± 1	79^a ± 1	66^b ± 1
	Isidor	63^a ± 0.85	81^a ± 1.32	78^a ± 1	58^a ± 1.56
	Santana	63^a ± 1	81^a ± 1.33	78^a ± 1.41	64^b ± 2
Overall significance level
Location	***
Sowing date	***
Cultivar	***
Year	***
Location x cultivar	*
Sowing date x cultivar	**
Cultivar x year	***

Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different within locations, cultivars, year or sowing dates at p< 0.05; ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05.

ES, early sowing; CS, conventional sowing; NT, not tested.