Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 29;123(6):905–908. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-0957-9

Table 2.

Comparison of cohorts of patients concomitantly receiving CDK4/6 inhibitor and radiation therapy.

CDK4/6 inhibitor Patients Number of irradiated sites Location metastasis LR RT suspension required CDKi suspension required Grade 2 non-haematologic toxicities Grade ≥ 2 haematologic toxicities
Hans et al.3 (6) Palbociclib 5 5 Bone (4), visceral (1) 0 0 0 0 5 (100%)
Meattini et al.4 (11) Ribociclib 5 8 Bone (5) and visceral (3) 0 0 2 (40%) 2 (25%) 1 (20%)
Kawamoto et al.8 (7) Palbociclib 1 1 Bone (1) 0 1 (100%) 1 (100%) 1 (100%) na
Kalash et al.9 (8) Palbociclib 3 3 Lung (3) 0 3 3 (100%) 3 (100%) na
Chowdhary et al.5 (12) Palbociclib 16 23 Bone (18), brain (4) and visceral (1) 0 0 0 0 na
Messer et al.10 (15) Palbociclib 1 1 0 1 (L4) 1 (100%) 1 (100%) 1 (100%) na
Figura et al.6 (13) Palbociclib and abemaciclib 15 42 Brain (42) 0 0 0 2 (5%) na
Ippolito et al.7 (14) Palbociclib and ribociclib 16 24 Bone (23) 1 (IMC) 2 (12%) 1 (6%) 1 (4%) 31%
Our study (2019) Palbociclib 30 35 Bone (24) and brain (2) 9 2 (6%) 3 (10%) 3 (8%) 8 (26%)

LR locoregional, IMC intermammary chain, CDKi CDK inhibitor.