Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Women Health. 2020 Jul 12;60(9):1032–1039. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2020.1789260

Table 4.

Crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs)a and associated 95% confidence interval (CIs) for the association between women who never had a mammography and odds factors of interest.

Crude odds ratio (95% CI) Adjusted odds ratiob (95% CI)
Age of ≤ 50 2.24 (0.99–5.04) 3.73 (1.31–10.67)
Marital status
 Married/Living together Referent Referent
 Separated/Divorced/widower 0.75 (0.25–2.29) 0.67 (0.17–2.75)
 fSingle 2.72 (1.07–6.91) 4.00 (1.25–12.83)
Number of children is 3 < 1.93 (0.89 – 4.22) 3.02 (1.07–8.54)
In need for Childcare 5.45 (1.65 – 17.97) 17.79 (2.93–108.04)
Never thought about mammography 22.65 (3.02–169.64) 23.58 (2.82 – 197.01)
Never heard about screening from a healthcare provider 3.38 (1.24–9.19) 2.45 (0.70–8.58)
Never heard about screening from media 3.39 (0.82–13.95) 2.37 (0.41–13.73)
Not aware of a screening location 2.28 (0.96–5.39) 2.53 (0.83–7.72)
a

Estimated using logistic regression

b

Adjusted for age, marital status, breast cancer screening is embarrassing, breast cancer screening is painful, thought about breast cancer screening, aware of a screening location, heard about screening from media, heard about breast cancer screening from healthcare provider, in need for a childcare, and number of children.