Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 16;15(9):e0238437. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238437

Table 2. Responses to usability scale statement (n = 60).

Categories No Item Range Mean SD
Ease of use 1 The VR simulation of schizophrenia program was easy to use. 5−10 8.38 1.26
2 The initial education regarding devices and usage was appropriate. 6−10 9.25 1.00
3 I wanted to continue watching other scenes and learning with related questions. 4−10 8.65 1.57
4 The presented text was easy to read. 2−10 7.48 2.15
5 The presented text was easy to understand. 2−10 7.75 1.5
6 In each phase of VR simulation, it was clear what to do next. 6−10 8.60 1.30
7 It was difficult to operate the devices (HMD and hand controller). 0−8 2.60 2.61
8 The VR simulation was close to a real clinical situation. 3−10 8.23 1.62
9 The video had good quality with high resolution. 5−10 6.83 1.98
10 The pace of the VR simulation program was good. 5−10 8.47 1.26
11 The audio quality was good. 4−10 8.15 1.76
Usefulness 12 The VR simulation of schizophrenia program would be helpful for my future practice in clinical settings. 7−10 8.87 1.05
13 The VR simulation of schizophrenia program would be helpful for improving my communication skills. 4−10 8.27 1.69
14 Besides the clinical training curriculum, the VR simulation of schizophrenia program could also be helpful in nursing education. 5−10 8.58 1.37
15 The VR simulation of schizophrenia program would be helpful for improving my knowledge. 6−10 8.63 1.09
16 The VR simulation of schizophrenia program would be helpful for improving my clinical decision-making capabilities. 4−10 8.53 1.38
17 I am interested in using other VR simulation programs. 3−10 8.90 1.42