Table 3. Detailed description of all behavioural variables measured in 11 subtests in MVCCB 2.
Name of subtests | Variables coded | Type of variable | Description | Inter-observer reliability (Cronbach’s alpha/ Cohen’s kappa) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Exploration | Exploration | Percentage time | Dog was moving/standing in the room and had its nose on or in close proximity (approx. 5 cm) to the floor/wall/object/s or both front paws placed on an elevated surface (e.g., window sill, table). | 0.95 |
Locomotion | Percentage time | Dog was moving in the room with or without any directed activity. | 0.99 | |
Inactive | Percentage time | Dog was inactive (sitting/standing/lying). | 0.99 | |
Position at O_1m | Percentage time | Dog was standing/sitting/lying or moving within 1m of O. | 0.94 | |
Looking at O | Percentage time | Dog’s head and eyes were orientated towards O (dog was moving or stationary). | 0.97 | |
Picture viewing | Follow O | Duration | Dog was moving in the direction of the moving O or stationary O. | 0.95 |
Move independent | Duration | Dog moved independently of O. | 0.90 | |
Position at O_1m | Duration | Dog was standing/sitting/lying or moving within 1m of O. | 0.96 | |
Looking at O | Duration | Dog’s head and eyes were orientated towards O (dog was moving or stationary). | 0.94 | |
Food choice | No. of correct choices | Frequency | Number of times the dog chose the plate with sausage in both step1 and step2. | 100 |
Separation | Position at door | Duration | Dog was positioned within the semi-circle in front of one of the two doors. | 0.96 |
Look at door | Duration | Dog was sitting/standing/lying outside the semi-circle but looking at one of the two doors. | 0.98 | |
Locomotion | Duration | Dog was moving in the room with or without any directed activity. | 0.98 | |
Exploration | Duration | Dog was moving/standing in the room and had its nose on or in close proximity (approx. 5 cm) to the floor/wall/object/s or both front paws placed on an elevated surface (e.g., window sill, table). | 0.97 | |
Greeting and Playing | Latency to approach S/O | Latency | Measured from the moment the dog approached S/O within 20cm after S/O entered the room and stood by the door. | 0.99 |
This variable was coded separately for S and O. | ||||
Greeting (S/O) | 4-point scale | 0: dog did not approach/approached initially but then avoided (with no interaction with S/O). 1: slowly sniffed or passively stood after approaching S/O with or without tail wagging. 2: friendly greeting, tail wagging, may have cuddled up, jumped or licked. 3: very excited/enthusiastically greeted with intensive searching for contact and tail wagging. |
0.98 Cohen’s kappa | |
This variable was coded separately for S and O. | ||||
Playing (S/O) | 4-point scale | 0: no play. 1: mouthed toy sometimes but did not play/ may have played after a while but needed some encouragement. 2: mouthed toy and sometimes pulled it/brought it back. 3: played more than 90% of time. |
0.99 Cohen’s kappa | |
Memory test with distraction | Latency to find food | Latency | Measured from the first detectable forward movement of the dog (after O removed the lead) until the dog found the food. | 0.99 |
Detour | Latency to success | Latency | Latency to get the reward in trial 1, 3 and 4. This variable was coded separately for each trial. | 100 |
Time close to gate | Duration | Duration of time dog stayed close to the gate (the head of the dog was within 50 cm of the gate) in trial 1, 3 and 4. This variable was coded separately for each trial. | 0.98 | |
Looking at E | Duration | Duration of time dog looked at E in trial 1, 3 and 4. This variable was coded separately for each trial. | 0.98 | |
Looking at O | Duration | Duration of time dog looked at O in trial 1, 3 and 4. This variable was coded separately for each trial. | 0.98 | |
Attention | Time looking at toy/human (E) | Duration | Total duration of time the dog looked at the moving toy/human (E). This variable was coded separately for the toy and human condition. | 0.98/0.98 |
Time looking at O | Duration | Total duration of time dog looked at O. This variable was coded separately for the toy and human condition. | 0.97/0.98 | |
Novel action | Latency to pull out board | Latency | Measured from the point when the yellow board was visible until the dog pulled out the board and ate the sausage in trial 1. | 100 |
Manipulative persistency | Manipulate toy | Percentage time | The toy was pushed or moved with the dogs’ nose or paw (only actual contact with the toy was measured) in step 1 and step 2 separately. | 0.95 |
Clicker training for eye contact | Latency to eye contact | Latency | Measured from the moment the dog had taken the sausage into its mouth until the dog looked up into the face of E. The average of the first 3 trials and average of the last 3 trials were measured as separate variables. | 0.96 |
Latency to find food | Latency | Measured from the moment the piece of sausage left E’s hand, until the dog found the food, and took it into its mouth. The average of the first 3 trials and the last 3 trials were used as separate variables. | 0.72 |