Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 14;6(9):e04819. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04819

Table 8.

Collective comparison between the developed and the reported methods for the simultaneous determination of AZI and LEVO mixtures.

Analytical methods λ(nm)
Linearity range (μg/mL)
Correlation coefficient
LOD
Comments
AZI LEVO AZI LEVO AZI LEVO AZI LEVO
Proposed method I 482 224 5.0–50.0 2.5–20.0 0.9996 0.9991 1.55 0.80 ∗No need to adjust pH
∗No need of pre-treatment or extraction
∗Non-destructive
Proposed method II 475–490 280–253 5.0–50.0 5.0–40.0 0.9995 0.9992 1.47 1.50
Reported method [4] 536 301 4.0–20.0 0.973 0.9983 1.07 0.84 ∗Lengthy
∗Buffer pH adjustment (apt to personal and/or instrumental variations which may affect the ruggedness of the methods)
∗Mandatory filtration of samples and mobile phase
∗Expensive organic solvents
Reported method [6] Method A 390–650 (AUC) 12.0–225 10.0–200 0.999 0.998 1.4 1.0
Method B 400–700 (AUC) 40.0–500 30.0–300 5.0 3.0
Reported method [5] Method I 245 290 20.0–100 0.9971 0.9975 6.0 8.52
Method II 245 290 4.08 9.50
Reported method [7] 269 50–150 0.99 0.99 34.5 43.6
Reported method [8] 285 50.0–150.0 0.9991 0.999 20.50 18.25
Reported method [9] 285 50.0–150 0.99 0.99 6.13 5.47
Reported method [10] 262 20.0–100 2.0–10.0 0.999 0.999 0.01 0.001