Table 8.
Collective comparison between the developed and the reported methods for the simultaneous determination of AZI and LEVO mixtures.
| Analytical methods | λ(nm) |
Linearity range (μg/mL) |
Correlation coefficient |
LOD |
Comments | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZI | LEVO | AZI | LEVO | AZI | LEVO | AZI | LEVO | |||
| Proposed method I | 482 | 224 | 5.0–50.0 | 2.5–20.0 | 0.9996 | 0.9991 | 1.55 | 0.80 | ∗No need to adjust pH ∗No need of pre-treatment or extraction ∗Non-destructive |
|
| Proposed method II | 475–490 | 280–253 | 5.0–50.0 | 5.0–40.0 | 0.9995 | 0.9992 | 1.47 | 1.50 | ||
| Reported method [4] | 536 | 301 | 4.0–20.0 | 0.973 | 0.9983 | 1.07 | 0.84 | ∗Lengthy ∗Buffer pH adjustment (apt to personal and/or instrumental variations which may affect the ruggedness of the methods) ∗Mandatory filtration of samples and mobile phase ∗Expensive organic solvents |
||
| Reported method [6] | Method A | 390–650 (AUC) | 12.0–225 | 10.0–200 | 0.999 | 0.998 | 1.4 | 1.0 | ||
| Method B | 400–700 (AUC) | 40.0–500 | 30.0–300 | 5.0 | 3.0 | |||||
| Reported method [5] | Method I | 245 | 290 | 20.0–100 | 0.9971 | 0.9975 | 6.0 | 8.52 | ||
| Method II | 245 | 290 | 4.08 | 9.50 | ||||||
| Reported method [7] | 269 | 50–150 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 34.5 | 43.6 | ||||
| Reported method [8] | 285 | 50.0–150.0 | 0.9991 | 0.999 | 20.50 | 18.25 | ||||
| Reported method [9] | 285 | 50.0–150 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 6.13 | 5.47 | ||||
| Reported method [10] | 262 | 20.0–100 | 2.0–10.0 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.01 | 0.001 | |||