Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 17;133:104071. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2020.104071

Table 2.

Prevalence of elementary capillaroscopic abnormalities (frequency score 2–3) and comparisons in acute vs recovered vs patients (Fisher's exact).

Abnormality Frequency score 2–3
All patients
(n = 82)
Acute
(n = 28)
Recovered n = (54) P
Enlarged capillary, n (%) 50 (61.0) 4 (14.3) 46 (85.2) <.001
Giant capillary, n (%) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Hemosiderin deposit, n (%) 19 (23.2) 13 (46.4) 6 (11.1) <.001
 Micro-thrombosis, n (%) 6 (7.3) 5 (17.9) 1 (1.9) .016
 Micro-hemorrhage, n (%) 13 (15.9) 8 (28.6) 5 (9.3) .027
Capillary density <9/mm, n (%) 41 (50.0) 7 (25.0) 34 (63.0) .002
Microvascular derangement, n (%) 39 (47.6) 14 (50.0) 25 (46.3) .8
Capillary ramification, n (%) 21 (25.6) 8 (28.6) 13 (24.1) .8
Meandering capillary, n (%) 44 (53.7) 0 (0) 44 (81.4) <.001
Sludge flow, n (%) 44 (53.7) 22 (78.6) 22 (40.7) .001
Pericapillary edema, n (%) 66 (80.5) 28 (100) 38 (70.4) <.001
Subpapillary plexus visibility, n (%) 7 (8.5) 1 (3.6) 6 (11.1) .4
Empty dermal papilla, n (%) 12 (14.6) 0 (0) 12 (22.2) .006
Avascular area, n (%) 3 (3.7) 0 (0) 3 (5.6) .05
Neoangiogenesis, n (%) 6 (7.3) 0 (0) 6 (11.1) .09

Bold is used to highlight a p-value <0.05 which is therefore considered statistically significant.

P comparisons between acute and recovered patients.