Table 3.
Estimated adjusted effect of the intervention components on odds of being free from metabolic syndrome, n = 221
| Estimate of parameter (SE)b | Odds ratio (95% CI) |
p-value (UBF) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 3.31 (1.29) | 0.0106 | ||
| Time | Baseline (ref) | - | - | - |
| Post-intervention | 0.76 (0.33) | 2.14 (1.11, 4.11) | 0.0222 (4.35) | |
| Age (years) | −0.06 (0.02) | 0.94 (0.90, 0.99) | 0.0110 (7.42) | |
| Intervention condition | S-DPP (ref) | - | - | - |
| F-DPP | 0.36 (0.50) | 1.43 (0.53, 3.83) | 0.4796 (1.04) | |
| Physical activity (/week) | ||||
| Less than 150 minutes (ref) | - | - | - | |
| More than 150 minutes | 0.47 (0.42) | 1.61 (0.71, 3.64) | 0.2564 (1.05) | |
| Reduction in total calorie intake (in 1000 Kcal)a | 0.36 (0.18) | 1.43 (1.00, 2.04) | 0.0499 (2.46) | |
| Reduction in total fat intake (in 100g)a | 0.85 (0.38) | 2.33 (1.10, 4.99) | 0.0270 (3.77) | |
| Reduction in saturated and trans-fat intake (in 100g)a | 2.19 (1.13) | 8.93 (0.97, 82.40) | 0.0535 (2.35) | |
| Reduction in sodium intake (in 1000 mg)a | 0.22 (0.11) | 1.25 (1.01, 1.54) | 0.0387 (2.92) |
Due to high correlation between reduction in calorie intake, fat intake, trans and saturated fat intake, and sodium intake, these variables were entered in the model one at a time along with other variables.
Parameters were estimated using mixed effect multilevel (2-levels) logistic regression model for repeated measures with MetS (metabolic syndrome) = ‘No’ vs. ‘Yes’ as the dependent variable. Estimates of standard errors of the model parameters were adjusted for multiple imputation.
S-DPP, standard diabetes prevention program; F-DPP, faith-based diabetes prevention program; Kcal, calories; g, gram; mg, milligram; SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval; UBF, upper bound of Bays factor; ref, reference category.