Table 3.
Subject | TPR | Acc | Fp | Fp/min | %Mi | %Att | %Command | Lag start | Lag stop |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 76.6 ± 23.2 | 0.19 ± 0.40 | 0.22 ± 0.60 | 84.3 ± 4.7 | 75.4 ± 5.7 | 77.9 ± 7.7 | 9.0 ± 4.0 | 5.6 ± 3.4 |
S2 | 75.0 ± 44.0 | 80.0 ± 21.8 | 0.31 ± 0.78 | 0.55 ± 1.38 | 72.4 ± 9.0 | 71.6 ± 6.9 | 70.1 ± 8.0 | 11.9 ± 4.8 | 7.6 ± 6.9 |
S3 | 87.5 ± 34.2 | 64.4 ± 20.5 | 0.81 ± 0.98 | 1.43 ± 1.73 | 70.2 ± 9.8 | 71.5 ± 7.4 | 71.8 ± 11.2 | 10.3 ± 5.3 | 3.4 ± 2.3 |
S4 | 75.0 ± 44.7 | 53.1 ± 8.7 | 1.25 ± 0.93 | 2.21 ± 1.64 | 56.8 ± 15.2 | 65.5 ± 5.1 | 57.8 ± 13.6 | 10.6 ± 6.3 | 5.8 ± 1.0 |
No poor results were achieved for the averaged indices per subject. Averaged very good results using the qualitative scale are in bold.