Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 3;8:735. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00735

Table 3.

Results of the training trials averaged per subject.

Subject TPR Acc Fp Fp/min %Mi %Att %Command Lag start Lag stop
S1 100.0 ± 0.0 76.6 ± 23.2 0.19 ± 0.40 0.22 ± 0.60 84.3 ± 4.7 75.4 ± 5.7 77.9 ± 7.7 9.0 ± 4.0 5.6 ± 3.4
S2 75.0 ± 44.0 80.0 ± 21.8 0.31 ± 0.78 0.55 ± 1.38 72.4 ± 9.0 71.6 ± 6.9 70.1 ± 8.0 11.9 ± 4.8 7.6 ± 6.9
S3 87.5 ± 34.2 64.4 ± 20.5 0.81 ± 0.98 1.43 ± 1.73 70.2 ± 9.8 71.5 ± 7.4 71.8 ± 11.2 10.3 ± 5.3 3.4 ± 2.3
S4 75.0 ± 44.7 53.1 ± 8.7 1.25 ± 0.93 2.21 ± 1.64 56.8 ± 15.2 65.5 ± 5.1 57.8 ± 13.6 10.6 ± 6.3 5.8 ± 1.0

No poor results were achieved for the averaged indices per subject. Averaged very good results using the qualitative scale are in bold.