Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 2;63(5):643–654. doi: 10.5468/ogs.20033

Table 3.

Correlation between tumour BRCA1/2 defects and clinico-pathological factors

Parameter Non mut/meth (n=81) BRCA1 meth (n=10) BRCA1/2 mut (n=18) P-value
BRCA1 meth vs. non mut/meth BRCA1/2 mut vs. non mut/meth
Age
 <59 33 (40.7) 6 (60) 12 (66.7) 0.320 0.070
 ≥59 48 (58.6) 4 (40) 6 (33.3)
FIGO stage 0.005 0.030
 I–II 37 (45.7) 0 (0) 3 (16.7)
 III–IV 44 (54.3) 10 (100) 15 (83.3)
Pathology 0.004 <0.001
 High grade serous 42 (51.9) 10 (100) 18 (100)
 Non-high grade serous 39 (47.6) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Cytoreduction 1.000 0.440
 Macro <1 cm 47 (58) 7 (70) 12 (66.7)
 Macro ≥1 cm 11 (13.6) 2 (20) 1 (5.5)
 Missing 23 (28.4) 1 (10) 5 (27.8)
Platinum sensitivity 0.150 0.750
 PFI <6 mon 17 (21) 5 (50) 3 (16.7)
 PFI ≥6 mon 48 (59.3) 5 (50) 13 (72.2)
 No chemo/missing 16 (19.8) 0 (0) 2 (11.1)

FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; Non mut/meth, BRCA1/2 wild type non-BRCA1-methylated; BRCA1 meth, BRCA1-methylated; BRCA1/2 mut, BRCA1/2-mutated; Macro, macroscopic residual disease; PFI, platinum-free interval.