Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 16;10:15200. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72114-3

Table 2.

Comparison of different microwave glucose sensors.

Ref Sensing technique Operating frequency (GHz) Test solution Sample volume (µL) Concentration (mg/dL) Sensing parameter S (per MHz/[mg/dL])
60 Microstrip based series resonator 6.5 Aqueous solution 50 0–70,000 fR (S21) 3.13E−05
38 Spatially separated SRR 1.4 Aqueous solution 600 504–3531 fR (S21) 1.83E−04
55 Dielectric resonator 1.68 Aqueous solution 5 5000–30,000 fR (S11) 2.00E−04
61 Rectangular waveguide cavity 1.9 Aqueous solution 43–170 500–2500 fR (S21) 4.00E−04
62 Patch antenna 5.0 Saline-glucose solutions 36,000 0–250 fR (S11) 1.09E−03
63 Open split ring resonator 6.5 Aqueous solution 0–40,000 fR (S21) 1.88E−03
40 ENG unit-cell resonator 2.074 Aqueous solution 2 2000–10,000 fR (S21) 1.00E−02
64 Single-port resonator 4.8 Aqueous solution 125 100–1000 fR (S11) 1.40E−02
65 Distributed MEMS transmission lines (DMTL) 16 Aqueous solution 0–34,780 fR (S11) 1.64E−02
66 Interdigitated capacitor (IDC) resonator-etched coplanar waveguide (CPW) 2.46 Aqueous solution 2 0–8000 fR (S21) 2.00E−02
41 Complementary electric-LC (CELC) resonator 1.0–1.70 Aqueous solution 0.63 2000–10,000 fR (S21) 2.11E−02
67 Split ring resonator 4.18 Aqueous solution 0–5000 fR (S21) 2.60E−02
This work Complementary split ring resonator driven by an ISM Radar 2.45 Aqueous solution 600 40–140 fR (S21)

4.5–9.50E−01 (dispersed)

6.3–12.5E−01 (compact)