Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 16;10:15189. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72240-y

Table 3.

Logistic regression predictive analysis for ‘Emerging Myopes-EMYO’ compared to ‘Persistent Emmetropes-PEMM’ for the younger cohort (between 6–7 and 15–16 years). Statistically significant predictive variables are underlined and in italics.

Predictive variables for emerging myopes Odds ratio (95% confidence interval)

Gender

Male 1, female 0

0.37 (0.11 to 1.23) p = 0.105

Socioeconomic status

Quintiles 1 to 5, 1 = low, 5 = high

1.18 (0.81 to 1.74) p = 0.393

At least one parent myopic

yes 1, no 0

6.28 (1.01 to 38.93) p = 0.048

Physical activity

Sedentary 1, light activity 2, regular activity up to 3 h/week 3, regular activity > 3 h/week 4

0.47 (0.19 to 1.19) p = 0.113

Time spent doing nearwork

Average hrs/week

0.76 (0.36 to 1.61) p = 0.471

BMI

Per unit increase

1.00 (0.74 to 1.36) p = 0.982

Height

Per m increase

0.14 (0 to 335.91) p = 0.625

Breastfed

Yes 1, no 0

1.03 (0.47 to 2.28) p = 0.933

Axial length at baseline

Per mm increase

2.50 (1.05 to 5.87) p = 0.038