Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 17;6:87. doi: 10.1038/s41394-020-00337-7

Table 2.

PO1 respiratory performance throughout the study.

MIP SMIP ID FVC FVC % predicted FEV1 FEV1 % predicted PEF PEF % predicted MEP
Baseline 50 196 9.9 1.71 28% 1.68 33% 3.51 31% 50
Week 2 59 208 9.1 1.9 32% 1.87 37% 4.22 38% 46
Week 3 61 244 8.9 1.8 31% 1.73 35% 3.97 36% 45
Week 4 60 235 10.7 1.85 31% 1.82 36% 3.35 30% 48
Follow-up 64 248 10 1.91 32% 1.82 36% 4.01 36% 50
Actual change 14 52 0.1 0.2 4% 0.14 3% 0.5 5% 0
Percent change 28% 26.5% 1% 11.7% 8.3% 14.2% 0%

MIP maximal inspiratory pressure measured in cmH2O, SMIP sustained MIP measured in pressure time units, ID inspiratory duration measured in seconds, FVC forced vital capacity measured in liters, FVC % Predicted percent of predicted FVC based on NHANES criteria, FEV1 forced expiratory volume in one second measured in liters, FEV1 % Predicted percent of predicted FEV1 based on NHANES criteria, PEF peak expiratory flow measured in liters/second, PEF % Predicted percent of predicted PEF based on NHANES criteria, MEP maximal expiratory pressure.