Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 16;40(9):BSR20200027. doi: 10.1042/BSR20200027

Table 1. Characteristics of eligible case–control studies included in this meta-analysis.

First author Year Country Ethnicity Type of disease Source of controls Genotyping method Number of cases Number of controls HWE (Control) NOS score
Zhu et al. [12] 2007 China Asian CHD HB PCR-RFLP 242 196 0.063 7
Ji et al. [23] 2015 China Asian ACS HB PCR-RFLP 195 159 0.077 6
Jensen et al. [24] 2009 Denmark Caucasian ACS PB TaqMan 998 1643 0.888 8
Rimm et al. [25] 1992 America Caucasian CAD PB PCR 262 519 0.063 8
Colditz et al. [26] 1997 America Caucasian CAD PB PCR 241 477 0.220 8
Tjonneland et al.(1) [27] 2007 Denmark Caucasian CHD PB TaqMan 235 763 0.838 8
Tjonneland et al.(2) [27] 2007 Denmark Caucasian CHD PB TaqMan 763 880 0.997 8
Tang et al. [9] 2008 China Asian CAD HB PCR-RFLP 265 265 0.103 7
Xie et al. [13] 2015 China Asian CAD HB PCR 287 367 0.065 7
Solim et al. [28] 2018 Turkey Caucasian CAD HB TaqMan 74 73 0.545 7
Elnaggar et al. [29] 2019 Egypt African CAD HB PCR-RFLP 84 42 0.492 8
Dalan et al. [30] 2013 Turkey Caucasian CAD HB PCR-RFLP 104 76 0.286 7
Cai et al. [14] 2014 China Asian CAD HB PCR-RFLP 135 166 0.146 7
Toosi et al. [31] 2015 Iran Asian CAD HB PCR-RFLP 140 80 0.092 8