Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 16;10:15165. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71744-x

Table 1.

Results from ten-temperature melting analysis of ClPPase variants.

Module Variant Tm (C)a Tm error (±C)b ΔTm (C) ΔTm error (±C)c Repeats (n) Status
n/a Wild-type 49.3 0.9 0.0 1.2 8 n/a
Deep-sequence S113A 53.6 2.8 4.3 3.0 3 Stabilising
Deep-sequence S273V 48.8 − 0.5 1 Neutral
Deep-sequence G130S 57.4 8.1 1 Stabilising
Deep-sequence S371K 50.6 1.3 1 Neutral
Deep-sequence F20Y 58.4 1.2 9.1 1.5 3 Stabilising
Model-based V81W 50.5 1.2 1 Stabilising
Model-based R463W 51.1 1.3 1.8 1.6 3 Neutral
Model-based L142P 44.0 0.5 − 5.3 1.0 3 Destabilising
Model-based L151I 49.7 1.2 0.4 1.5 2 Neutral
Model-based V693Y 51.4 2.1 1 Stabilising
Model-based R109W 52.7 1.7 3.4 1.9 3 Stabilising
Model-based R290F 50.5 1.2 3 Stabilising
Model-based D468F 52.0 0.6 2.7 1.1 1 Stabilising
Model-based I501L 50.6 1.3 1 Neutral
Model-based G179A 52.9 1.5 3.6 1.7 3 Stabilising
Data-driven A492L 47.7 − 1.6 1 Destabilising
Data-driven A14L 48.4 − 0.9 1 Neutral
Data-driven G31A 51.0 1.7 1 Stabilising
Data-driven A319L 51.5 2.2 1 Stabilising
Data-driven G130A 62.3 1.1 13.0 1.4 3 Stabilising
Data-driven A114L 50.2 0.9 1 Neutral
Combined G130A+F20Y 59.6 1.8 10.3 2.0 3 Stabilising

aAverage Tm was calculated from individual Tm estimated for each individual repeat by fitting with a four-parameter dose-response curve (variable slope) by non-linear least-squares fitting in the python package scipy.stats.

bFor n > 1: standard error of the mean (SEM) shown.

cFor n > 1: error calculated and propagated as detailed in “Methods and materials” section.