Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 17.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2016 May-Jun;13(3):231–238.

Table III.

Ion PGM versus Sanger sequencing results for 9 esophageal cancer samples.

# Sample ID Pathological diagnosis Gene Mutation AA Ion PGM Variant Frequency (%) Sanger result Consistent?
1 7 ESCC TP53 p.R175H 47.01 YES
2 39 EAC TP53 p.A159V 30.53 YES
3 34 EAC TP53 p.C176F 39.57 YES
4 3 ESCC TP53 p.R175H 35.16 YES
5 49 ESCC TP53 p.H179R 20.20 YES
6 33 EAC PIK3CA p.E542K 11.14 YES
7 45 ESCC TP53 p.R342* 66.92 YES
8 47 ESCC TP53 p.C275Y 12.92 YES
9 8 ESCC TP53 p.R342* 14.4 YES
*

Nonsense mutations resulting in STOP codon; EAC: esophageal adenocarcinoma; ESCC: esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.