Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 17;20:447. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02845-0

Table 4.

Acceptability, feasibility and perceived utility of the e-decision-aid’s (DA) in the Intervention group (n = 56, T1)

Agree/Somewhat Agree Disagree/Somewhat disagree
n (%) n (%)
Perceived ease of use of e-DA
 Font easy-to-use 50 (89.3) 6 (10.7)
 Easy-to-use 50 (89.3) 6 (10.7)
 Clearly organised information 51 (91.1) 5 (8.9)
 Design appealing 51 (91.1) 5 (8.9)
 Easy-to-understand information 52 (92.9) 4 (7.1)
 Colours pleasant 53 (94.6) 3 (5.4)
 Pictures pleasant 52 (92.9) 4 (7.1)
 Important information easy-to-find 46 (82.1) 10 (17.9)
Perceived usefulness of e-DA
 Content interesting 52 (92.9) 4 (7.1)
 Useful in making a treatment decision 50 (89.3) 6 (10.7)
 Right amount of information included 47 (83.9) 9 (16.1)
 Information I needed included 49 (87.5) 7 (12.5)
 Helped with my concerns 46 (82.1) 10 (17.9)
 Found links to information and other resources 47 (83.9) 9 (16.1)
 Learnt something new 46 (82.1) 10 (17.9)
 Made it easier to discuss treatment options with (my) clinician 48 (85.7) 8 (14.3)
 Made it easier to discuss treatment options with family 40 (71.4) 16 (28.6)
Attitudes towards using e-DA
 Would recommend to others in my situation 51 (91.1) 5 (8.9)
 Would go back and re-read sections 51 (91.1) 5 (8.9)
 Information did not make me anxious 47 (83.9) 9 (16.1)
Perceived trustworthiness and balance of information in e-DA
 Information trustworthy 52 (92.9) 4 (7.1)
 Information up-to-date 52 (92.9) 4 (7.1)
 Equal emphasis on each of the medication options 52 (92.9) 4 (7.1)
 Equal emphasis on each of the adjunctive psychological options 50 (89.3) 6 (10.7)
n (%)
Access of the e-DA (self-report)
 Yes, all pages/sections 10 (17.9)
 Yes, quite thoroughly 9 (16.1)
 Yes, briefly/only sections I felt relevant to me 29 (51.8)
 No, because… (e.g., forgot to, technical/internet problems) 9 (16.1)
Visits to key information pages on site (yes)
 All pages visited 16 (15.5%)
 >/= 50% pages visited 24 (23.3%)
 < 50% pages visited 63 (61.2%)
Use of Values Clarification Exercises
  < 1 treatment option exercise completed 79 (76.7%)
 1–3 treatment option exercise/s completed 19 (18.4%)
 All 4 treatment option exercises completed 5 (4.9%)