Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 17.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Cancer Ther. 2016 Jun 20;15(9):2251–2258. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0908

Table 2.

Response, PFS, and OS by polymorphisms and HER2 amplification status

Response
Progression-free survival
Overall survival
Polymorphisms n Yes No Pa Median (95% CI) HR (95% CI)c Pa Median (95% CI) HR (95% CI)c Pa
CCND1 A870G 0.71 0.32 0.73
 A/A 16 2 (13%) 14 (88%) 3.0 (2.0–4.2) 1 (Ref) 6.3 (3.3–11.6) 1 (Ref)
 A/Gb 32 8 (20%) 32 (80%) 3.0 (2.6–4.3) 0.74 (0.40–1.37) 5.8 (3.5–9.1) 1.12 (0.58–2.19)
 G/Gb 8
COX2 G765C 0.34 0.26 0.30
 G/G 47 7 (15%) 40 (85%) 3.0 (2.5–3.8) 1 (Ref) 5.4 (3.8–8.1) 1 (Ref)
 G/Cb 2 3 (33%) 6 (67%) 5.7 (2.6–5.8+) 0.63 (0.26–1.48) 9.1 (3.5–23.1) 0.62 (0.24–1.57)
 C/Cb 7
EGF A61G 0.73 0.92 0.85
 G/G 19 3 (16%) 16 (84%) 3.1 (2.9–4.3) 1 (Ref) 5.8 (3.7–14.7) 1 (Ref)
 G/A 27 6 (22%) 21 (78%) 2.9 (2.0–4.3) 1.10 (0.59–2.05) 5.6 (3.3–8.6) 1.20 (0.62–2.33)
 A/A 10 1 (10%) 9 (90%) 2.6 (1.6–8.6) 1.16 (0.51–2.63) 8.1 (1.1–15.9) 1.06 (0.45–2.52)
EGFR G497A 0.16 0.33 0.087
 G/G 24 2 (8%) 22 (92%) 2.9 (2.5–4.3) 1 (Ref) 4.2 (2.6–8.6) 1 (Ref)
 G/Ab 24 8 (25%) 24 (75%) 3.3 (1.8–4.3) 0.76 (0.43–1.36) 7.3 (4.2–14.8) 0.61 (0.33–1.10)
 A/Ab 8
HER2 G655A 0.48 0.82 0.45
 A/A 35 5 (14%) 30 (86%) 2.9 (1.8–4.2) 1 (Ref) 4.4 (3.5–8.1) 1 (Ref)
 A/G 21 5 (24%) 16 (76%) 3.8 (2.8–4.4) 0.94 (0.53–1.66) 8.6 (3.8–14.7) 0.80 (0.43–1.46)
IL8 T251A 0.36 0.23 0.23
 T/T 19 3 (16%) 16 (84%) 3.1 (1.7–4.1) 1 (Ref) 5.4 (3.5–7.3) 1 (Ref)
 T/A 24 3 (13%) 21 (88%) 2.9 (2.5–4.3) 0.86 (0.45–1.65) 6.3 (3.1–15.4) 0.61 (0.32–1.19)
 A/A 13 4 (31%) 9 (69%) 4.2 (3.0–5.8) 0.54 (0.25–1.20) 5.8 (2.0–22.9) 0.58 (0.25–1.36)
MTHFR C677T 0.72 0.96 0.99
 C/C 22 3 (14%) 19 (86%) 3.0 (1.7–4.4) 1 (Ref) 8.1 (3.5–11.6) 1 (Ref)
 C/Tb 26 7 (21%) 27 (79%) 3.0 (2.6–4.2) 1.01 (0.57–1.80) 5.0 (3.8–7.3) 1.01 (0.55–1.82)
 T/Tb 8
MTHFR A1298C 0.16 0.071 0.23
 A/A 31 8 (26%) 23 (74%) 3.0 (2.6–5.3) 1 (Ref) 7.2 (4.2–9.3) 1 (Ref)
 A/Cb 20 2 (8%) 23 (92%) 3.0 (1.7–4.1) 1.63 (0.92–2.91) 4.4 (3.0–8.6) 1.42 (0.79–2.56)
 C/Cb 5
TS-5′UTR 1.00 0.87 0.26
 2R/2R, 2R/3C, 3C/3C 20 3 (15%) 17 (85%) 3.1 (2.6–4.4) 1 (Ref) 5.4 (3.1–12.9) 1 (Ref)
 2R/3G, 3G/3C 26 5 (19%) 21 (81%) 2.9 (1.8–4.2) 1.07 (0.57–2.01) 8.1 (3.8–14.8) 0.67 (0.34–1.33)
 3G/G 10 2 (20%) 8 (80%) 2.8 (1.6–4.3) 1.22 (0.56–2.67) 4.2 (2.2–8.6) 1.17 (0.51–2.69)
TS-3′UTR 0.75 0.97 0.68
 +/+ 14 3 (21%) 11 (79%) 3.1 (1.7–4.3) 1 (Ref) 5.4 (3.5–11.4) 1 (Ref)
 +/− 22 3 (14%) 19 (86%) 2.6 (1.8–5.3) 0.96 (0.45–2.05) 5.8 (2.9–14.7) 0.73 (0.32–1.64)
 −/− 20 4 (20%) 16 (80%) 3.0 (1.8–4.3) 1.03 (0.49–2.18) 6.1 (3.8–8.6) 0.88 (0.40–1.95)
VEGF C936T 1.00 0.78 0.66
 C/C 42 8 (19%) 34 (81%) 3.0 (2.8–4.3) 1 (Ref) 5.8 (3.8–9.1) 1 (Ref)
 C/Tb 12 2 (14%) 12 (86%) 2.6 (1.7–4.3) 0.91 (0.48–1.75) 5.6 (2.6–8.1) 1.16 (0.59–2.30)
 T/Tb 2
HER2 status 0.66 0.95 0.80
 Amplified 8 1 (13%) 7 (88%) 4.3 (1.6–8.5) 1 (Ref) 6.3 (2.6–16.7) 1 (Ref)
 Not amplified 34 8 (24%) 26 (76%) 3.0 (2.8–4.3) 1.02 (0.46–2.28) 5.8 (3.8–8.6) 1.10 (0.49–2.47)
a

Based on Fisher exact test for response and log-rank test for PFS and OS.

b

Dominant model: combining patients carrying heterozygous and homozygous variant genotypes together for outcome analyses.

c

Based on the method described by Berry and colleagues (38).