Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 8;72(1):119–129. doi: 10.1002/hep.31018

Table 1.

Subject Characteristics

Total (n = 3,170) Underweight (n = 212) Normal Weight (n = 2,410) Overweight (n = 456) Obesity (n = 92) P Value
Maternal characteristics
Age, mean (SD), years 31.1 (4.9) 31.3 (4.7) 31.4 (4.7) 30.0 (5.2) 29.0 (5.9) <0.001
Prepregnancy BMI, mean (SD), kg/m2 23.5 (4.2) 21.8 (3.2) 23.1 (3.8) 25.4 (4.6) 28.8 (6.1) <0.001
Parity, n (%), nulliparous 1,769 (55.8) 132 (62.3) 1,325 (55.0) 257 (56.4) 55 (59.8) 0.179
Education, n (%), higher education 1,540 (52.7) 109 (54.5) 1,273 (57.2) 150 (36.1) 8 (10.0) <0.001
Child characteristics
Age, mean (SD), years 9.8 (0.3) 9.8 (0.4) 9.8 (0.3) 9.9 (0.4) 9.8 (0.3) 0.033
Boys, n (%) 1,563 (49.3) 112 (52.8) 1,221 (50.7) 191 (41.9) 39 (42.4) 0.002
Ethnicity, n (%), European 2,118 (68.2) 150 (72.1) 1,706 (72.2) 229 (51.3) 33 (37.5) <0.001
Birth weight, mean (SD), g 3,445 (557) 3,264 (575) 3,458 (549) 3,483 (553) 3,376 (679) <0.001
BMI, mean (SD), kg/m2 17.5 (2.7) 14.1 (0.5) 16.8 (1.3) 21.3 (1.2) 23.5 (2.1) <0.001
Visceral fat mass, median (95% range), g 358 (161; 982) 245 (135; 478) 338 (162; 709) 602 (268; 1,216) 853 (362; 1,862) <0.001
Liver fat fraction, median (95% range), % 2.0 (1.2; 5.3) 1.8 (1.1; 3.1) 2.0 (1.2; 4.1) 2.5 (1.4; 8.7) 3.1 (1.7; 17.9) <0.001
Prevalence nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, n (%) 90 (2.8) 1 (0.5) 26 (1.0) 41 (9.1) 23 (25.0) <0.001
Systolic blood pressure, mean (SD), mm Hg 103.3 (8.0) 99.3 (7.6) 102.4 (7.5) 107.3 (7.8) 113.0 (8.8) <0.001
Diastolic blood pressure, mean (SD), mm Hg 58.6 (6.4) 57.6 (6.3) 58.4 (6.4) 59.5 (6.5) 61.8 (7.6) <0.001
Insulin, median (95% range), pmol/L 182 (35.2; 629.1) 144 (27.9; 471.8) 172 (34.5; 569.2) 242 (48.0; 798.2) 339 (45.2; 1,178.0) <0.001
Glucose, mean (SD), mmol/L 5.3 (0.9) 5.3 (1.0) 5.3 (1.0) 5.2 (0.8) 5.3 (0.7) 0.114
HOMA‐IR, median (95% range) 7.0 (1.1; 28.8) 5.7 (0.9; 22.8) 6.6 (1.1; 26.9) 9.3 (1.6; 32.1) 12.4 (1.5; 50.5) <0.001
Total cholesterol, mean (SD), mmol/L 4.3 (0.7) 4.3 (0.6) 4.3 (0.6) 4.4 (0.7) 4.5 (0.7) <0.001
HDL cholesterol, mean (SD), mmol/L 1.5 (0.3) 1.6 (0.4) 1.5 (0.3) 1.4 (0.3) 1.2 (0.2) <0.001
LDL cholesterol, mean (SD), mmol/L 2.3 (0.6) 2.3 (0.5) 2.3 (0.6) 2.5 (0.6) 2.6 (0.7) <0.001
Triglycerides, median (95% range), mmol/L 1.0 (0.4; 2.6) 0.87 (0.4; 2.2) 0.9 (0.4; 2.5) 1.1 (0.5; 2.9) 1.5 (0.5; 3.8) <0.001
C‐reactive protein, median (95% range), mg/L 0.3 (0.3; 5.7) 0.3 (0.3; 6.1) 0.3 (0.3; 4.4) 0.9 (0.3; 10.2) 1.5 (0.3; 14.2) <0.001
Prevalence cardiometabolic clustering, n (%) 254 (13.3) 2 (1.8) 106 (7.2) 114 (42.1) 32 (72.7) <0.001

Values are observed, but not imput data and represent means (SD), medians (95% range) or numbers of subjects (valid %). Differences between BMI categories were tested using one‐way ANOVA tests for continuous variables and χ2 test for categorical variables. HOMA‐IR was calculated using the formula: insulin resistance = (insulin [μU/L] × glucose [mmol/L])/22.5. LDL cholesterol is calculated according to the Friedewald formula. Cardiometabolic clustering was defined as having three or more risk factors (high [greater than seventy‐fifth percentile] visceral fat mass, high [greater than seventy‐fifth percentile] systolic or diastolic blood pressure, low [less than twenty‐fifth percentile] HDL cholesterol or high [greater than seventy‐fifth percentile] triglycerides, and high [greater than seventy‐fifth percentile] insulin). The prevalence of cardiometabolic clustering was calculated in a subgroup of complete cases (n = 1,906).