Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 2;26(9):5235–5253. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15203

TABLE 3.

Cross consistency among the retrieved gross primary production (GPP) and ecosystem respiration (RECO) by NNC‐part, daytime method (DT), and nighttime method (NT) methods at half hourly time step, also after removing the mean daily value of the fluxes. Statistics reported in the table are the median of the study sites values, in brackets the 25th and 75th percentile

Gross CO2 flux Variability Comparison Statistics
R 2 RMSE (µmol CO2 m−2 s−1) Bias (µmol CO2 m−2 s−1)
GPP Overall NNC‐part versus DT .96 (.93/.97) 1.22 (0.76/1.52) −0.042 (−0.17/0.039)
NNC‐part versus NT .94 (.89/.95) 1.53 (0.89/2.02) −0.068 (−0.18/0.025)
DT versus NT .90 (.84/.93) 1.84 (1.20/2.43) 0.020 (−0.16/0.14)
Removing mean daily value NNC‐part versus DT .95 (.93/.97) 0.93 (0.59/1.11)
NNC‐part versus NT .90 (.86/.92) 1.34 (0.82/1.86)
DT versus NT .86 (.81/.89) 1.55 (1.02/2.13)
RECO Overall NNC‐part versus DT .73 (.54/.83) 0.98 (0.70/1.29) −0.023 (−0.19/0.12)
NNC‐part versus NT .87 (.72/.92) 0.68 (0.47/0.83) −0.072 (−0.16/0.022)
DT versus NT .78 (.65/.86) 0.95 (0.64/1.21) −0.0045 (−0.21/0.16)
Removing mean daily value NNC‐part versus DT .21 (.09/.32) 0.39 (0.28/0.51)
NNC‐part versus NT .24 (.11/.38) 0.35 (0.26/0.47)
DT versus NT .68 (.62/.76) 0.20 (0.14/0.26)