Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 25;34(7):1569–1578. doi: 10.1111/jdv.16347

Table 5.

Summary and comparison with previous ocular syphilis studies

Our Study Moradi, et al. 29 Lee, et al. 33 Shen, et al. 15 Pratas, et al. 37 Oliver, et al. 22 Ghanimi Zamli, et al. 38
Research period 2009–2017 1984–2014 2008–2014 2009–2014 2012–2015 2014–2015 2013–2017
Research location Shanghai, China United States of America Los Angeles Zhejiang, China France North Carolina Malaysia
Number of ocular syphilis 213 35 16 13 21 63 10
Blindness patients, % (n) 23% (50) 21% (7) 44% (7) 8% (1) NR 6% (4) 50% (5)
Mean age, years 55 49 43 50 49 45 70
Male sex, % (n) 66% (140) 74% (26) 100% (16) 54% (7) 100% (21) 94% (59) 30% (3)
Known MSM, % (n)* 10% (14) 35% (9) 44% (7) 0% (0) 76% (16) 71% (42) 0% (0)
Co‐infection with HIV, % (n) 3% (7) 54% (19) 63% (10) 8% (1) 29% (6) 56% (35) 0% (0)
Risk factors for ocular syphilis Increasing age and higher RPR titres NR NR NR NR Male, aged ≥40 years, white, infected with HIV, and higher RPR titre NR
CSF‐VDRL reactive 84% 47% 20% 25% 21% 63% NR
Most common type of ocular diagnosis Optic atrophy, optic neuritis Pan uveitis Pan uveitis, posterior uveitis Chorioretinitis Posterior uveitis Uveitis Posterior uveitis
Improved vision after treatment 36% 33% 38% 62% 75% 85% 85%

NR, result not reported

*

Percentage calculated of males.

Percentage calculated of those with CSF analysis performed.

Data from 50 cases of blindness.