Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 26;40(5):527–537. doi: 10.1002/micr.30574

Table 3.

Comparisons of meaningful sensory and motor function of PNA to reference data

Sensory function No repairs reporting MRCC scores for sensory function Meaningful sensory ≥S3, N, % Reference data a
All repairs 449 362, 81% NA
Digital sensory repairs 356 299, 84%

Conduit: 44–75%

Autograft: 70–90%

Upper extremity: Sensory nerve 19 13, 68% NA
Upper extremity mixed nerve 55 39, 71%

Conduit: 8%

Autograft: 71–85%

Lower extremity sensory nerve 3 3, 100% NA
Lower extremity mixed nerve 14 6, 43%

Conduit: NA

Autograft: 24–80%

Head neck 2 2, 100% NA
Motor function No repairs reporting MRCC scores for motor function Meaningful motor ≥M3, N, % Reference data a
All repairs 62 41, 66% NA
Upper extremity 52 36, 69%

Conduit: 8%

Autograft: 67%

Lower extremity 6 1, 17%

Conduit: NA

Autograft: 14–86%

Head neck 4 4, 100% NA
a

Reference data source is provided in Data S1.