Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 26;40(5):527–537. doi: 10.1002/micr.30574

Table 7.

Subgroup assessment of higher thresholds of meaningful recovery in upper extremity nerve repairs reporting long‐term follow‐up

Subgroup Number of repairsa Repairs reporting higher thresholds (% MRCC ≥ S3+ or M4)
Gap length (mm)
<15 113 88%
15–29 139 84%
30–49 76 68%
50–70 25 56%
Time to repair
Acute 300 78%
Chronic 51 78%
Delayed 18 89%
Age (years)
Under 18 8 100%
18–29 111 76%
30–49 126 83%
50–64 84 80%
65+ 41 63%
Mechanism of injury
Laceration 239 81%
Neuroma 30 87%
Complex 101 69%
a

PNA repairs included subjects from the primary analysis reporting at least 12 months of follow‐up for sensory repairs and 18 months follow‐up for mixed motor repairs.