Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 26;91(4):e853–e865. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13334

Table 5.

RI‐CLPM, Standardized Within‐Person Cross‐Lagged Effects (n = 543)

(T2 →) SMU intensity SMU problems Attention deficit Impulsivity Hyperactivity
β SE p β SE p β SE p β SE p β SE p
(T1 ↓)
SMU intensity .10 .15 .506 .02 .05 .758 .05 .08 .508 .03 .10 .739 .10 .08 .221
SMU problems .31 .21 .140 .79 .04 < .001 .31 .11 .004 .19 .13 .150 .07 .09 .409
Attention deficit −.03 .18 .857 −.04 .05 .421 .42 .12 .001 .05 .13 .721 −.08 .09 .391
Impulsivity −.06 .18 .735 .13 .08 .090 −.08 .17 .623 .07 .17 .671 .03 .14 .857
Hyperactivity .14 .16 .380 −.04 .04 .413 −.06 .12 .611 .19 .11 .094 .53 .10 < .001
(T3 →) SMU intensity SMU problems Attention deficit Impulsivity Hyperactivity
β SE p β SE p β SE p β SE p β SE p
(T2 ↓)
SMU intensity .29 .29 .311 −.05 .06 .447 −.13 .20 .511 −.08 .16 .602 −.04 .19 .831
SMU problems .33 .24 .163 .99 .04 < .001 .50 .21 .016 .51 .14 < .001 .28 .20 .158
Attention deficit −.26 .22 .248 −.01 .05 .910 .19 .24 .431 −.19 .18 .281 −.26 .22 .241
Impulsivity .13 .17 .450 −.05 .04 .294 .19 .15 .191 .38 .14 .008 .14 .16 .382
Hyperactivity .08 .20 .678 .00 .05 .999 −.26 .16 .112 .04 .13 .763 .34 .18 .054

Light grey cells depict results for Hypotheses 1 and 2; Dark grey cells depict results for Hypotheses 3 and 4. All coefficients were STDyx‐standardized. SMU = social media use; RI‐CLPM = random intercept cross‐lagged panel model.