Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 21;26(8):1000–1009. doi: 10.1002/lt.25738

Table 4.

Bile Biochemistry According to the Preservation Technique of the Graft

DBD (n = 57) DCD (n = 11) NRP (n = 13) NESLiP (n = 18)* P Value
pH 7.82 (7.67‐7.98) 7.79 (7.54‐7.94) 7.82 (7.65‐8.0) 7.87 (7.67‐8.0) 0.67
Glucose, mmol/L 2.5 (1.6‐4.1) 2.6 (2.2‐8.7) 1.2 (0.9‐2.2) 1.7 (1.4‐2.4) 0.005
pCO2, kPa 2.1 (1.1‐3.1) 2.2 (1.6‐3.5) 2.0 (1.2‐4.0) 1.6 (1.0‐2.9) 0.37
Na+, mmol/L 146 (143‐150) 143 (139‐148) 146 (143‐149) 148 (142‐149) 0.38
K+, mmol/L 5.1 (4.8‐5.6) 5.2 (4.1‐5.5) 4.7 (4.3‐5.2) 4.9 (4.4‐5.8) 0.56
HCO3-, mmol/L 22.5 (19.3‐26.8) 22.5 (19.6‐24.2) 29.1 (18.5‐35.6) 23.1 (16.2‐27.2) 0.48
Bile‐blood pH difference 0.49 (0.37‐0.62) 0.39 (0.20‐0.51) 0.53 (0.40‐0.62) 0.53 (0.40‐0.67) 0.32
Blood‐bile glucose difference, mmol/L 8.6 (6.2‐10.4) 4.8 (3.5‐6.5) 6.2 (5.9‐8.0) 6.6 (4.8‐8.4) 0.001
Bile‐blood Na difference, mmol/L 8 (5‐12) 5 (2‐11) 7 (6‐11) 7 (5‐11) 0.38

Data are given as median (IQR). One liver had both NRP and NESLiP and was excluded.

*

NESLiP group includes 8 DBD livers and 10 DCD livers.

DBD versus NRP, P = 0.03; DCD versus NRP, P = 0.015 (Dunn’s pairwise test with Bonferroni correction).

DBD versus DCD, P = 0.002.