Table 6.

Logistic regression for variables predicting refusal to accept funds for scenario with the highest percent refusal overall and lowest percent refusal overall, 2017–2018

Variable	Scenario 6 (see Table 5)		Scenario 16 (see Table 5)
	OR (95% CI)	p value	OR (95% CI)	p value
Region (base: USA)
Europe	3.44 (0.73–16.09)	0.117	5.58 (1.11–27.94)	0.036
LMICs	1.10 (0.30–4.03)	0.888	3.98 (0.79–19.90)	0.093
Gender (base: male)
Female	1.08 (0.44–2.62)	0.866	1.65 (0.54–5.02)	0.376
Current academic rank (base: prof/prof emeritus)
Associate professor	0.91 (0.31–2.67)	0.859	0.69 (0.18–2.62)	0.581
Assistant professor	1.87 (0.50–6.95)	0.348	1.09 (0.22–5.30)	0.918
Other	0.71 (0.15–3.30)	0.662	0.36 (0.03–3.97)	0.402
% of salary offset required (base: 0%)
1–25%	0.64 (0.16–2.56)	0.531	0.52 (0.06–4.77)	0.560
26–50%	0.84 (0.22–3.22)	0.801	0.96 (0.16–5.94)	0.965
Over 50%	0.90 (0.30–2.68)	0.845	1.18 (0.27–5.14)	0.822
Primary identity (base: researcher)
Practitioner	2.79 (0.31–25.48)	0.362	1.64 (0.16–16.81)	0.676
Teacher/lecturer/instructor	0.41 (0.12–1.36)	0.145	1.20 (0.28–5.15)	0.803
Received training on research ethics (base: no)
Yes	1.89 (0.30–11.93)	0.497	0.72 (0.10–5.43)	0.752
Completed research ethics online course (base: no)
Yes	0.89 (0.22–3.52)	0.864	1.19 (0.29–4.89)	0.806
Attended conference on ethics of receiving for-profit funding (base: no)
Yes	0.64 (0.24–1.73)	0.378	0.34 (0.06–1.74)	0.193