Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 24;24(Suppl 2):191–199. doi: 10.1007/s10995-020-02880-z

Table 4.

Comparison of program retention by MPPTI site, 2014–2017

Site pair Difference between means in months 95% confidence limits Significant at 0.05 level
Chelsea–Lawrence 2.2  − 2.5, 6.8
Chelsea–New Bedford 6.5 1.2, 11.8 *
Chelsea–Holyoke 7.1 2.1, 12.1 *
Chelsea–Springfield 9.6 4.9, 14.4 *
Holyoke–Chelsea  − 7.1  − 12.1, − 2.1 *
Holyoke–Lawrence  − 4.9  − 9.5, − 0.3 *
Holyoke–New Bedford  − 0.5  − 5.8, 4.7
Holyoke–Springfield 2.6  − 2.2, 7.3
Lawrence–Chelsea  − 2.2  − 6.8, 14.4
Lawrence–New Bedford 4.4  − 0.5, 9.3
Lawrence–Holyoke 4.9 0.3, 9.5 *
Lawrence–Springfield 7.5 3.1, 11.8 *
New Bedford–Chelsea  − 6.5  − 11.9, − 1.2 *
New Bedford–Lawrence  − 4.4  − 9.2, 0.5
New Bedford–Holyoke 0.5  − 4.7, 5.8
New Bedford–Springfield 3.1  − 2.0, 8.2
Springfield–Chelsea  − 9.6  − 14.4, − 4.6 *
Springfield–Lawrence  − 7.5  − 11.8, − 3.1 *
Springfield–New Bedford  − 3.1  − 8.2, 2.0
Springfield–Holyoke  − 2.6  − 2.6, − 7.3

Notes. Pairwise comparisons made using Scheffe’s test. MPPTI Massachusetts Pregnant and Parenting Teen Initiative